SSDJX vs. SSBWX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SSDJX (State Street Target Retirement 2050 Fund) and SSBWX (State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds from State Street. Over the past 10 years, SSDJX returned 11.39%/yr vs 9.24%/yr for SSBWX. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SSDJX charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SSBWX.

Performance

SSDJX vs. SSBWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Target Retirement 2050 Fund (SSDJX) and State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund (SSBWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSDJX achieves a 11.24% return, which is significantly higher than SSBWX's 7.46% return. Over the past 10 years, SSDJX has outperformed SSBWX with an annualized return of 11.39%, while SSBWX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.24% annualized return.

SSDJX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 1.79%
• YTD: 11.24%
• 6M: 10.53%
• 1Y: 25.64%
• 3Y*: 17.90%
• 5Y*: 8.41%
• 10Y*: 11.39%

SSBWX

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 0.94%
• YTD: 7.46%
• 6M: 7.01%
• 1Y: 17.70%
• 3Y*: 13.60%
• 5Y*: 6.29%
• 10Y*: 9.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSDJX vs. SSBWX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SSDJX State Street Target Retirement 2050 Fund	11.24%	20.71%	12.35%	19.18%	-19.24%	13.12%	19.69%	25.73%	-8.12%	18.90%
SSBWX State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund	7.46%	15.92%	9.76%	15.66%	-17.17%	10.75%	17.27%	22.52%	-6.23%	16.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SSDJX and SSBWX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2014	0.99

The correlation between SSDJX and SSBWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SSDJX vs. SSBWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSDJX

SSDJX Risk / Return Rank: 70
SSDJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
SSDJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
SSDJX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
SSDJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
SSDJX Martin Ratio Rank: 70

SSBWX

SSBWX Risk / Return Rank: 73
SSBWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
SSBWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
SSBWX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
SSBWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
SSBWX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSDJX vs. SSBWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Target Retirement 2050 Fund (SSDJX) and State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund (SSBWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SSDJX	SSBWX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	2.32	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.15	3.28	-0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.46	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	2.95	+0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.67	12.85	-0.18

SSDJX vs. SSBWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSDJX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the SSBWX Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSDJX and SSBWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SSDJX vs. SSBWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSDJX drawdown since its inception was -29.95%, which is greater than SSBWX's maximum drawdown of -23.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSDJX and SSBWX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SSDJX	SSBWX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.95%	-23.73%	-6.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.73%	-6.20%	-2.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.70%	-9.73%	-4.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.45%	-23.73%	-3.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.95%	-23.73%	-6.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.37%	-0.46%	+0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.03%	-4.15%	-0.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.08%	1.42%	+0.66%

Volatility

SSDJX vs. SSBWX - Volatility Comparison

State Street Target Retirement 2050 Fund (SSDJX) has a higher volatility of 4.61% compared to State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund (SSBWX) at 3.12%. This indicates that SSDJX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSBWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SSDJX	SSBWX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.61%	3.12%	+1.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.62%	6.54%	+3.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.64%	7.90%	+3.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.23%	10.71%	+3.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.81%	11.35%	+3.46%

SSDJX vs. SSBWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSDJX has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than SSBWX's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SSDJX vs. SSBWX - Dividend Comparison

SSDJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.44%, less than SSBWX's 6.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SSBWX State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund	6.43%	6.91%	6.16%	4.11%	5.78%	6.18%	4.92%	6.65%	5.24%	0.46%	1.75%	2.11%
SSDJX State Street Target Retirement 2050 Fund	5.44%	6.05%	4.63%	3.13%	5.47%	4.87%	4.13%	6.79%	5.05%	0.45%	1.73%	1.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SSDJX and SSBWX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, SSDJX and SSBWX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SSDJX or SSBWX?

SSDJX has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to SSBWX (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSDJX dropped -29.95% vs SSBWX's -23.73%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SSBWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.