PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JIBRX vs. PDT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JIBRX vs. PDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Multi-Index Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio (JIBRX) and John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIBRX achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly higher than PDT's 3.84% return. Over the past 10 years, JIBRX has outperformed PDT with an annualized return of 7.97%, while PDT has yielded a comparatively lower 6.12% annualized return.


JIBRX

1D
0.29%
1M
3.43%
YTD
8.61%
6M
9.03%
1Y
19.64%
3Y*
13.62%
5Y*
6.43%
10Y*
7.97%

PDT

1D
-0.39%
1M
-2.34%
YTD
3.84%
6M
3.30%
1Y
4.47%
3Y*
12.74%
5Y*
2.52%
10Y*
6.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JIBRX vs. PDT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JIBRX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio
8.61%14.57%9.57%13.16%-15.50%11.79%12.17%19.48%-5.62%11.87%
PDT
John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund
3.84%7.64%29.92%-9.55%-16.30%25.98%-14.20%39.29%-12.49%21.22%

Correlation

The correlation between JIBRX and PDT is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.47

The correlation between JIBRX and PDT shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JIBRX vs. PDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIBRX
JIBRX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
JIBRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIBRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIBRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
JIBRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIBRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

PDT
PDT Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
PDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDT Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
PDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDT Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIBRX vs. PDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Multi-Index Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio (JIBRX) and John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JIBRXPDTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.09

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

0.83

+2.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.15

1.92

+12.23

JIBRX vs. PDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIBRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the PDT Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIBRX and PDT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JIBRXPDTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

0.50

+1.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.15

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.24

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.31

+0.35

Drawdowns

JIBRX vs. PDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIBRX drawdown since its inception was -25.37%, smaller than the maximum PDT drawdown of -62.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIBRX and PDT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JIBRXPDTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.37%

-62.39%

+37.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.20%

-5.38%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.16%

-22.06%

+11.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.78%

-40.44%

+18.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.37%

-62.39%

+37.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.11%

+4.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.61%

-10.02%

+6.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.41%

2.33%

-0.92%

Volatility

JIBRX vs. PDT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Funds Multi-Index Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio (JIBRX) is 2.57%, while John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT) has a volatility of 3.08%. This indicates that JIBRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JIBRXPDTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.57%

3.08%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.49%

6.93%

-0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.06%

8.93%

-0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.64%

17.03%

-6.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.28%

25.16%

-13.88%

JIBRX vs. PDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIBRX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than PDT's 5.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

JIBRX vs. PDT - Dividend Comparison

JIBRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, less than PDT's 7.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JIBRX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio
2.33%2.60%2.49%2.64%10.69%6.33%3.99%6.71%8.04%2.86%3.19%2.15%
PDT
John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund
7.75%7.80%7.77%10.14%9.04%6.42%8.43%6.70%8.69%9.94%9.15%7.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


JIBRX and PDT have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDT has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to JIBRX (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIBRX dropped -25.37% vs PDT's -62.39%.

JIBRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JIBRX and PDT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer