JIBRX vs. TAGRX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

JIBRX (John Hancock Funds Multi-Index Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio) and TAGRX (John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund) are both mutual funds - JIBRX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by John Hancock, while TAGRX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by John Hancock. Over the past 10 years, JIBRX returned 7.94%/yr vs 12.69%/yr for TAGRX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JIBRX charges 0.38%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for TAGRX.

Performance

JIBRX vs. TAGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Multi-Index Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio (JIBRX) and John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIBRX achieves a 8.30% return, which is significantly higher than TAGRX's 4.13% return. Over the past 10 years, JIBRX has underperformed TAGRX with an annualized return of 7.94%, while TAGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.69% annualized return.

JIBRX

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 2.75%
• YTD: 8.30%
• 6M: 9.14%
• 1Y: 19.50%
• 3Y*: 13.51%
• 5Y*: 6.30%
• 10Y*: 7.94%

TAGRX

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 1.99%
• YTD: 4.13%
• 6M: 4.88%
• 1Y: 18.00%
• 3Y*: 16.54%
• 5Y*: 8.74%
• 10Y*: 12.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JIBRX vs. TAGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JIBRX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio	8.30%	14.57%	9.57%	13.16%	-15.50%	11.79%	12.17%	19.48%	-5.62%	11.87%
TAGRX John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund	4.13%	9.98%	21.14%	32.23%	-24.86%	29.16%	20.55%	35.06%	-14.09%	19.63%

Correlation

The correlation between JIBRX and TAGRX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014	0.90

The correlation between JIBRX and TAGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JIBRX vs. TAGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIBRX

JIBRX Risk / Return Rank: 71
JIBRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
JIBRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
JIBRX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
JIBRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
JIBRX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

TAGRX

TAGRX Risk / Return Rank: 20
TAGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
TAGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
TAGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
TAGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
TAGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIBRX vs. TAGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Multi-Index Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio (JIBRX) and John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JIBRX	TAGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	1.46	+1.00
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.51	2.01	+1.50
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.26	+0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.21	1.31	+1.90
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.16	4.58	+9.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JIBRX vs. TAGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIBRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the TAGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIBRX and TAGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JIBRX	TAGRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47	1.46	+1.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	0.44	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71	0.62	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	0.47	+0.19

Drawdowns

JIBRX vs. TAGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIBRX drawdown since its inception was -25.37%, smaller than the maximum TAGRX drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIBRX and TAGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JIBRX	TAGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.37%	-58.45%	+33.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.20%	-14.04%	+7.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.16%	-26.11%	+15.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.78%	-29.10%	+7.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.37%	-36.96%	+11.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.61%	-11.54%	+7.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.41%	4.01%	-2.60%

Volatility

JIBRX vs. TAGRX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds Multi-Index Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio (JIBRX) and John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX) have volatilities of 2.57% and 2.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JIBRX	TAGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.57%	2.58%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.49%	9.54%	-3.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.08%	12.49%	-4.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.64%	20.17%	-9.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.28%	20.50%	-9.22%

JIBRX vs. TAGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIBRX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than TAGRX's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

JIBRX vs. TAGRX - Dividend Comparison

JIBRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, less than TAGRX's 11.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JIBRX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio	2.34%	2.60%	2.49%	2.64%	10.69%	6.33%	3.99%	6.71%	8.04%	2.86%	3.19%	2.15%
TAGRX John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund	11.61%	12.09%	13.00%	6.67%	6.76%	7.82%	0.30%	0.53%	14.05%	8.22%	2.96%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JIBRX and TAGRX in my portfolio?

JIBRX and TAGRX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JIBRX or TAGRX?

TAGRX has higher volatility (2.58%) compared to JIBRX (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIBRX dropped -25.37% vs TAGRX's -58.45%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JIBRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.