JIBFX vs. LSSAX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

JIBFX (Johnson Institutional Core Bond Fund) and LSSAX (Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, JIBFX returned 1.82%/yr vs 2.52%/yr for LSSAX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JIBFX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for LSSAX.

Performance

JIBFX vs. LSSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Johnson Institutional Core Bond Fund (JIBFX) and Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIBFX achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than LSSAX's 1.24% return. Over the past 10 years, JIBFX has underperformed LSSAX with an annualized return of 1.82%, while LSSAX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.52% annualized return.

JIBFX

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 0.06%
• YTD: 0.19%
• 6M: 0.24%
• 1Y: 5.42%
• 3Y*: 4.08%
• 5Y*: 0.03%
• 10Y*: 1.82%

LSSAX

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 1.24%
• 6M: 1.48%
• 1Y: 7.13%
• 3Y*: 5.86%
• 5Y*: 1.38%
• 10Y*: 2.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JIBFX vs. LSSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JIBFX Johnson Institutional Core Bond Fund	0.19%	7.87%	1.21%	5.43%	-13.69%	-2.04%	9.71%	8.95%	0.10%	3.73%
LSSAX Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund	1.24%	8.32%	3.94%	7.01%	-11.82%	0.64%	4.68%	6.81%	2.48%	3.40%

Correlation

The correlation between JIBFX and LSSAX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2006	0.77

The correlation between JIBFX and LSSAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (all time) to 0.91 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

JIBFX vs. LSSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIBFX

JIBFX Risk / Return Rank: 20
JIBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
JIBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
JIBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
JIBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
JIBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

LSSAX

LSSAX Risk / Return Rank: 50
LSSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
LSSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
LSSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
LSSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
LSSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIBFX vs. LSSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Johnson Institutional Core Bond Fund (JIBFX) and Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JIBFX	LSSAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.26	2.11	-0.85
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	3.29	-1.41
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.40	-0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.72	2.79	-1.07
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.28	7.60	-2.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JIBFX vs. LSSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIBFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the LSSAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIBFX and LSSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JIBFX	LSSAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.26	2.11	-0.85
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.00	0.25	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.34	0.58	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.95	-0.71

Drawdowns

JIBFX vs. LSSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIBFX drawdown since its inception was -19.54%, which is greater than LSSAX's maximum drawdown of -16.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIBFX and LSSAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JIBFX	LSSAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.54%	-16.40%	-3.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.11%	-2.16%	-0.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.02%	-5.91%	-1.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.96%	-16.40%	-2.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.54%	-16.40%	-3.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.89%	-0.61%	-2.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.16%	-1.98%	-3.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.01%	0.90%	+0.11%

Volatility

JIBFX vs. LSSAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Johnson Institutional Core Bond Fund (JIBFX) is 1.39%, while Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX) has a volatility of 1.47%. This indicates that JIBFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JIBFX	LSSAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.39%	1.47%	-0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.86%	2.66%	+0.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.08%	4.11%	-0.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.54%	5.78%	+0.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.33%	4.42%	+0.91%

JIBFX vs. LSSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIBFX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than LSSAX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

JIBFX vs. LSSAX - Dividend Comparison

JIBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, less than LSSAX's 4.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JIBFX Johnson Institutional Core Bond Fund	3.93%	3.85%	3.69%	2.92%	2.41%	1.75%	3.11%	2.76%	2.77%	2.52%	3.03%	2.60%
LSSAX Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund	4.34%	4.23%	4.54%	5.65%	6.47%	6.38%	5.95%	5.48%	5.62%	5.42%	5.12%	5.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JIBFX and LSSAX in my portfolio?

JIBFX and LSSAX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JIBFX or LSSAX?

LSSAX has higher volatility (1.47%) compared to JIBFX (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIBFX dropped -19.54% vs LSSAX's -16.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LSSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.