PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHTFX vs. JVMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHTFX vs. JVMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (JHTFX) and John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I (JVMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHTFX achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly lower than JVMIX's 14.27% return. Over the past 10 years, JHTFX has underperformed JVMIX with an annualized return of 2.13%, while JVMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.85% annualized return.


JHTFX

1D
-0.15%
1M
-2.47%
6M
0.95%
YTD
1.68%
1Y
6.39%
3Y*
4.63%
5Y*
-0.17%
10Y*
2.13%
ALL TIME*
3.94%

JVMIX

1D
0.06%
1M
2.11%
6M
8.96%
YTD
14.27%
1Y
19.08%
3Y*
13.92%
5Y*
10.02%
10Y*
10.85%
ALL TIME*
6.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JHTFX vs. JVMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JHTFX
John Hancock High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
1.68%3.07%6.57%6.84%-16.77%5.69%4.65%9.50%0.61%6.83%
JVMIX
John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I
14.27%11.28%10.46%16.64%-7.09%26.85%5.90%30.13%-14.90%15.10%

Correlation

The correlation between JHTFX and JVMIX is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 1997

-0.06

The correlation between JHTFX and JVMIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHTFX vs. JVMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JHTFX
JHTFX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
JHTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
JHTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

JVMIX
JVMIX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
JVMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JVMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
JVMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
JVMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
JVMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JHTFX vs. JVMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (JHTFX) and John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I (JVMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JHTFXJVMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.25

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

2.09

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.74

6.75

+0.99

JHTFX vs. JVMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHTFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the JVMIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHTFX and JVMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JHTFX vs. JVMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHTFX drawdown since its inception was -22.40%, smaller than the maximum JVMIX drawdown of -67.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHTFX and JVMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHTFXJVMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.40%

-67.04%

+44.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.20%

-8.57%

+5.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.21%

-21.13%

+12.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.40%

-21.13%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.40%

-42.64%

+20.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.47%

-1.54%

-0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.89%

-13.29%

+10.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

2.65%

-1.76%

Volatility

JHTFX vs. JVMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (JHTFX) is 1.23%, while John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I (JVMIX) has a volatility of 3.47%. This indicates that JHTFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JVMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHTFXJVMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

3.47%

-2.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.10%

9.10%

-6.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.95%

12.96%

-9.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.92%

18.22%

-12.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.59%

20.22%

-14.63%

JHTFX vs. JVMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHTFX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than JVMIX's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHTFX vs. JVMIX - Dividend Comparison

JHTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, less than JVMIX's 8.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JHTFX
John Hancock High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
4.72%6.24%4.03%3.29%3.48%3.44%3.76%6.05%4.45%4.55%4.43%4.67%
JVMIX
John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I
8.09%9.24%12.05%4.02%5.27%6.67%1.13%2.40%13.85%5.94%1.91%5.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHTFX and JVMIX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JVMIX has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to JHTFX (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHTFX dropped -22.40% vs JVMIX's -67.04%.

JHTFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHTFX and JVMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer