JHTFX vs. JCCIX
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (JHTFX) and John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund (JCCIX).
JHTFX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1993. JCCIX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Dec 20, 2013.
Performance
JHTFX vs. JCCIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JHTFX vs. JCCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHTFX John Hancock High Yield Municipal Bond Fund | -0.94% | 3.07% | 6.57% | 6.84% | -16.77% | 5.69% | 4.65% | 9.50% | 0.61% | 6.83% |
JCCIX John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund | -2.42% | -1.90% | 10.62% | 16.52% | -19.09% | 24.10% | 25.99% | 26.79% | -18.28% | 16.04% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHTFX achieves a -0.94% return, which is significantly higher than JCCIX's -2.42% return. Over the past 10 years, JHTFX has underperformed JCCIX with an annualized return of 2.21%, while JCCIX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.83% annualized return.
JHTFX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -3.06%
- YTD
- -0.94%
- 6M
- 0.47%
- 1Y
- 0.53%
- 3Y*
- 4.24%
- 5Y*
- 0.22%
- 10Y*
- 2.21%
JCCIX
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -9.12%
- YTD
- -2.42%
- 6M
- -0.08%
- 1Y
- 6.25%
- 3Y*
- 5.11%
- 5Y*
- 0.91%
- 10Y*
- 8.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JHTFX vs. JCCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHTFX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than JCCIX's 0.98% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JHTFX vs. JCCIX — Risk / Return Rank
JHTFX
JCCIX
JHTFX vs. JCCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (JHTFX) and John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund (JCCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JHTFX | JCCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.22 | 0.25 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.34 | 0.53 | -0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.07 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.28 | 0.26 | +0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.68 | 0.93 | -0.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JHTFX | JCCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 | 0.25 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.04 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.41 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 0.35 | +0.57 |
Correlation
The correlation between JHTFX and JCCIX is -0.03. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
JHTFX vs. JCCIX - Dividend Comparison
JHTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, more than JCCIX's 4.64% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHTFX John Hancock High Yield Municipal Bond Fund | 5.12% | 6.24% | 4.03% | 3.29% | 3.48% | 3.44% | 3.76% | 6.05% | 4.45% | 4.55% | 4.43% | 4.67% |
JCCIX John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund | 4.64% | 4.53% | 0.96% | 0.83% | 0.99% | 12.20% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 5.55% | 11.90% | 0.73% | 1.07% |
Drawdowns
JHTFX vs. JCCIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHTFX drawdown since its inception was -22.40%, smaller than the maximum JCCIX drawdown of -38.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHTFX and JCCIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHTFX | JCCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.40% | -38.69% | +16.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.36% | -15.22% | +7.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.40% | -27.47% | +5.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.40% | -38.69% | +16.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.52% | -11.11% | +7.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.91% | -7.69% | +4.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 4.20% | -1.14% |
Volatility
JHTFX vs. JCCIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (JHTFX) is 1.33%, while John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund (JCCIX) has a volatility of 6.10%. This indicates that JHTFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JCCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JHTFX | JCCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.33% | 6.10% | -4.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.33% | 13.44% | -11.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.53% | 23.76% | -16.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.82% | 21.59% | -15.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.54% | 21.42% | -15.88% |