PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHTFX vs. JCCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHTFX vs. JCCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (JHTFX) and John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund (JCCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHTFX achieves a 3.06% return, which is significantly lower than JCCIX's 23.06% return. Over the past 10 years, JHTFX has underperformed JCCIX with an annualized return of 2.30%, while JCCIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.17% annualized return.


JHTFX

1D
-0.15%
1M
2.38%
YTD
3.06%
6M
3.80%
1Y
7.31%
3Y*
5.15%
5Y*
0.37%
10Y*
2.30%

JCCIX

1D
0.40%
1M
5.70%
YTD
23.06%
6M
21.04%
1Y
31.27%
3Y*
13.48%
5Y*
5.17%
10Y*
11.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHTFX vs. JCCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JHTFX
John Hancock High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
3.06%3.07%6.57%6.84%-16.77%5.69%4.65%9.50%0.61%6.83%
JCCIX
John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund
23.06%-1.90%10.62%16.52%-19.09%24.10%25.99%26.79%-18.28%16.04%

Correlation

The correlation between JHTFX and JCCIX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2013

-0.02

The correlation between JHTFX and JCCIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHTFX vs. JCCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHTFX
JHTFX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
JHTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
JHTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

JCCIX
JCCIX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
JCCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JCCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
JCCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
JCCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
JCCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHTFX vs. JCCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (JHTFX) and John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund (JCCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JHTFXJCCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.30

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

3.20

-0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.53

10.23

-2.70

JHTFX vs. JCCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHTFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the JCCIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHTFX and JCCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JHTFX vs. JCCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHTFX drawdown since its inception was -22.40%, smaller than the maximum JCCIX drawdown of -38.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHTFX and JCCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHTFXJCCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.40%

-38.69%

+16.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.20%

-10.42%

+7.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.09%

-27.47%

+18.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.40%

-27.47%

+5.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.40%

-38.69%

+16.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

0.00%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.90%

-7.58%

+4.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

3.25%

-2.26%

Volatility

JHTFX vs. JCCIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (JHTFX) is 1.04%, while John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund (JCCIX) has a volatility of 6.06%. This indicates that JHTFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JCCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHTFXJCCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.04%

6.06%

-5.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.86%

13.44%

-10.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.92%

18.91%

-14.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.89%

21.69%

-15.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.58%

21.54%

-15.96%

JHTFX vs. JCCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHTFX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than JCCIX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHTFX vs. JCCIX - Dividend Comparison

JHTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, more than JCCIX's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JCCIX
John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund
3.68%4.53%0.96%0.83%0.99%12.20%1.43%0.00%5.55%11.90%0.73%1.07%
JHTFX
John Hancock High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
5.05%6.24%4.03%3.29%3.48%3.44%3.76%6.05%4.45%4.55%4.43%4.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHTFX and JCCIX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JCCIX has higher volatility (6.06%) compared to JHTFX (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHTFX dropped -22.40% vs JCCIX's -38.69%.

JHTFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHTFX and JCCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer