PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHSC vs. FSMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHSC vs. FSMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) and Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHSC achieves a 11.55% return, which is significantly lower than FSMD's 14.85% return.


JHSC

1D
-0.76%
1M
2.04%
YTD
11.55%
6M
10.59%
1Y
24.10%
3Y*
14.51%
5Y*
7.04%
10Y*

FSMD

1D
-0.08%
1M
3.46%
YTD
14.85%
6M
14.81%
1Y
25.71%
3Y*
17.63%
5Y*
9.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHSC vs. FSMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JHSC
John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF
11.55%6.88%9.74%20.77%-14.65%19.55%11.60%6.70%
FSMD
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
14.85%8.70%15.18%17.37%-11.15%26.40%8.94%8.81%

Correlation

The correlation between JHSC and FSMD is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2019

0.96

The correlation between JHSC and FSMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

JHSC vs. FSMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JHSC
FSMD

Financial Services

18.3%
15.4%

Industrials

16.8%
20.7%

Technology

14.1%
18.2%

Consumer Cyclical

14.1%
11.1%

Energy

7.5%
4.6%

Healthcare

7.4%
11.6%

Real Estate

6.0%
6.2%

Basic Materials

5.1%
3.9%

Utilities

4.2%
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
3.3%

Communication Services

3.0%
2.8%

Financial Services

JHSC
18.3%
FSMD
15.4%

Industrials

JHSC
16.8%
FSMD
20.7%

Technology

JHSC
14.1%
FSMD
18.2%

Consumer Cyclical

JHSC
14.1%
FSMD
11.1%

Energy

JHSC
7.5%
FSMD
4.6%

Healthcare

JHSC
7.4%
FSMD
11.6%

Real Estate

JHSC
6.0%
FSMD
6.2%

Basic Materials

JHSC
5.1%
FSMD
3.9%

Utilities

JHSC
4.2%
FSMD
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

JHSC
3.4%
FSMD
3.3%

Communication Services

JHSC
3.0%
FSMD
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHSC vs. FSMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHSC
JHSC Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
JHSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHSC Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
JHSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHSC Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMD
FSMD Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHSC vs. FSMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) and Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JHSCFSMDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.49

1.69

-0.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.22

2.47

-0.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.30

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

3.06

-0.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.69

11.03

-2.33

JHSC vs. FSMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHSC Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the FSMD Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHSC and FSMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JHSCFSMDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

1.69

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.53

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.55

-0.16

Drawdowns

JHSC vs. FSMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHSC drawdown since its inception was -42.66%, roughly equal to the maximum FSMD drawdown of -40.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHSC and FSMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHSCFSMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.66%

-40.67%

-1.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.63%

-8.44%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.16%

-22.16%

-3.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.21%

-22.16%

-3.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-0.08%

-0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.78%

-6.00%

-1.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

2.34%

+0.44%

Volatility

JHSC vs. FSMD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) is 4.16%, while Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) has a volatility of 4.45%. This indicates that JHSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHSCFSMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

4.45%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.11%

11.37%

-0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.27%

15.26%

+1.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.15%

18.48%

+1.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.21%

21.42%

+0.79%

JHSC vs. FSMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHSC has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMD's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHSC vs. FSMD - Dividend Comparison

JHSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than FSMD's 1.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FSMD
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
1.21%1.33%1.29%1.37%1.54%1.18%1.32%1.37%0.00%
JHSC
John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF
1.01%1.13%0.96%0.98%1.13%1.08%1.12%1.14%1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, JHSC and FSMD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSMD has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to JHSC (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHSC dropped -42.66% vs FSMD's -40.67%.

On 5-year performance, FSMD leads with 9.66% vs 7.04% for JHSC. On fees, FSMD is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, JHSC has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FSMD has performed better with a 9.66% return vs 7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FSMD is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for JHSC.

FSMD has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 1.01% for JHSC.

JHSC tracks John Hancock Dimensional Small Cap Index, while FSMD tracks Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index. They also come from different issuers: Manulife and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for JHSC and 0.29% for FSMD.

FSMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHSC and FSMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer