JHPI vs. CSSD
JHPI (John Hancock Preferred Income ETF) and CSSD (Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF) are both Preferred Stock funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. JHPI charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for CSSD.
Performance
JHPI vs. CSSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHPI achieves a 1.91% return, which is significantly lower than CSSD's 3.22% return.
JHPI
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 1.91%
- 1Y
- 5.40%
- 3Y*
- 8.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.71%
CSSD
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- 6M
- 2.03%
- YTD
- 3.22%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $130.43K | $632.60K | $285.67K | |
| $1.07M | $1.09M | $1.18M |
JHPI vs. CSSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JHPI John Hancock Preferred Income ETF | 1.91% | 0.70% |
CSSD Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF | 3.22% | 0.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHPI and CSSD is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHPI vs. CSSD — Risk / Return Rank
JHPI
CSSD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
JHPI vs. CSSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Preferred Income ETF (JHPI) and Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF (CSSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JHPI | CSSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.42 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JHPI vs. CSSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHPI drawdown since its inception was -13.45%, which is greater than CSSD's maximum drawdown of -2.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHPI and CSSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHPI | CSSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.45% | -2.32% | -11.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.52% | -0.07% | -0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.63% | -0.28% | -3.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.84% | — | — |
Volatility
JHPI vs. CSSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHPI | CSSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.83% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.61% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.38% | 2.96% | +0.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.21% | 2.96% | +3.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.21% | 2.96% | +3.25% |
JHPI vs. CSSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHPI has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than CSSD's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHPI vs. CSSD - Dividend Comparison
JHPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.88%, more than CSSD's 3.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSSD Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF | 3.63% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JHPI John Hancock Preferred Income ETF | 5.88% | 5.73% | 6.32% | 6.44% | 6.27% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JHPI and CSSD have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSSD is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSSD is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for JHPI.
JHPI has the higher dividend yield at 5.88%, compared with 3.63% for CSSD.
They also come from different issuers: John Hancock and Cohen & Steers. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for JHPI and 0.49% for CSSD.
Find the right allocation for JHPI and CSSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer