PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHMM vs. TPLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHMM vs. TPLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) and Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHMM achieves a 12.60% return, which is significantly higher than TPLC's 8.78% return.


JHMM

1D
-0.24%
1M
3.21%
YTD
12.60%
6M
13.14%
1Y
24.83%
3Y*
17.01%
5Y*
8.39%
10Y*
11.88%

TPLC

1D
-0.12%
1M
1.66%
YTD
8.78%
6M
7.78%
1Y
12.59%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
8.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHMM vs. TPLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JHMM
John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF
12.60%10.73%14.61%14.53%-15.30%24.54%16.22%9.05%
TPLC
Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund
8.78%7.08%13.10%15.17%-12.58%26.34%14.55%9.83%

Correlation

The correlation between JHMM and TPLC is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2019

0.97

The correlation between JHMM and TPLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

JHMM vs. TPLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JHMM
TPLC

Industrials

19.4%
23.2%

Technology

17.2%
16.7%

Financial Services

15.3%
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

11.0%
9.0%

Healthcare

10.2%
9.3%

Utilities

5.4%
11.6%

Energy

5.4%
8.2%

Real Estate

5.4%
0.3%

Basic Materials

4.2%
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
3.8%

Communication Services

2.7%
0.2%

Industrials

JHMM
19.4%
TPLC
23.2%

Technology

JHMM
17.2%
TPLC
16.7%

Financial Services

JHMM
15.3%
TPLC
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

JHMM
11.0%
TPLC
9.0%

Healthcare

JHMM
10.2%
TPLC
9.3%

Utilities

JHMM
5.4%
TPLC
11.6%

Energy

JHMM
5.4%
TPLC
8.2%

Real Estate

JHMM
5.4%
TPLC
0.3%

Basic Materials

JHMM
4.2%
TPLC
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

JHMM
3.7%
TPLC
3.8%

Communication Services

JHMM
2.7%
TPLC
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHMM vs. TPLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHMM
JHMM Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
JHMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHMM Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
JHMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHMM Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

TPLC
TPLC Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
TPLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPLC Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
TPLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPLC Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHMM vs. TPLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) and Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JHMMTPLCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.77

1.10

+0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.55

1.65

+0.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.19

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

1.67

+1.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.17

5.94

+5.23

JHMM vs. TPLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHMM Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the TPLC Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHMM and TPLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JHMMTPLCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

1.10

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.51

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.56

+0.07

Drawdowns

JHMM vs. TPLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHMM drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, which is greater than TPLC's maximum drawdown of -38.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMM and TPLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHMMTPLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.71%

-38.02%

-2.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.64%

-7.58%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.88%

-18.18%

-3.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.10%

-21.63%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-0.12%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.43%

-5.29%

-0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

2.13%

+0.10%

Volatility

JHMM vs. TPLC - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC) at 2.70%. This indicates that JHMM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TPLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHMMTPLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

2.70%

+1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.47%

8.45%

+2.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.12%

11.50%

+2.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.32%

16.14%

+2.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.60%

19.89%

-0.29%

JHMM vs. TPLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHMM has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than TPLC's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHMM vs. TPLC - Dividend Comparison

JHMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, more than TPLC's 0.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JHMM
John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF
0.87%0.98%1.01%1.17%1.16%0.72%1.04%1.02%1.36%0.90%1.15%0.33%
TPLC
Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund
0.84%0.89%0.88%0.89%1.06%0.61%0.81%0.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, JHMM and TPLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JHMM has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to TPLC (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHMM dropped -40.71% vs TPLC's -38.02%.

On 5-year performance, JHMM leads with 8.39% vs 8.22% for TPLC. On fees, JHMM is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, TPLC has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JHMM has performed better with a 8.39% return vs 8.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JHMM is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for TPLC.

JHMM has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.84% for TPLC.

JHMM tracks John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index, while TPLC tracks Victory U.S. Large Cap Volatility Weighted BRI Index. They also come from different issuers: Manulife and Timothy Plan. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for JHMM and 0.52% for TPLC.

JHMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHMM and TPLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer