JHMM vs. MYY
JHMM (John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF) and MYY (ProShares Short S&P Mid Cap400) are both exchange-traded funds - JHMM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index, while MYY is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the S&P Mid Cap 400 (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JHMM returned 11.91%/yr vs -11.12%/yr for MYY. At a correlation of -0.96, they often move in opposite directions. JHMM charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for MYY.
Performance
JHMM vs. MYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHMM achieves a 12.87% return, which is significantly higher than MYY's -11.15% return. Over the past 10 years, JHMM has outperformed MYY with an annualized return of 11.91%, while MYY has yielded a comparatively lower -11.12% annualized return.
JHMM
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 2.92%
- YTD
- 12.87%
- 6M
- 14.13%
- 1Y
- 26.43%
- 3Y*
- 17.11%
- 5Y*
- 8.57%
- 10Y*
- 11.91%
MYY
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- -2.87%
- YTD
- -11.15%
- 6M
- -11.58%
- 1Y
- -17.83%
- 3Y*
- -9.90%
- 5Y*
- -6.02%
- 10Y*
- -11.12%
JHMM vs. MYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF | 12.87% | 10.73% | 14.61% | 14.53% | -15.30% | 24.54% | 16.22% | 30.01% | -9.57% | 19.96% |
MYY ProShares Short S&P Mid Cap400 | -11.15% | -4.05% | -7.08% | -9.46% | 10.23% | -23.04% | -25.94% | -19.98% | 12.79% | -14.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHMM and MYY is -0.97, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2015 | -0.96 |
The correlation between JHMM and MYY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.98 to -0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHMM vs. MYY — Risk / Return Rank
JHMM
MYY
JHMM vs. MYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) and ProShares Short S&P Mid Cap400 (MYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JHMM | MYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.88 | -1.15 | +3.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.69 | -1.56 | +4.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 0.82 | +0.51 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | -0.99 | +4.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.85 | -1.80 | +13.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JHMM | MYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | -1.15 | +3.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | -0.31 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | -0.52 | +1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | -0.53 | +1.16 |
Drawdowns
JHMM vs. MYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHMM drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, smaller than the maximum MYY drawdown of -95.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMM and MYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHMM | MYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.71% | -95.08% | +54.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.64% | -17.58% | +8.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.88% | -33.48% | +11.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.10% | -36.20% | +12.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.71% | -71.22% | +30.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -95.08% | +95.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -72.14% | +66.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 9.74% | -7.51% |
Volatility
JHMM vs. MYY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) is 3.85%, while ProShares Short S&P Mid Cap400 (MYY) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that JHMM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MYY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHMM | MYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.85% | 4.49% | -0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.49% | 11.42% | -0.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.11% | 15.59% | -1.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.32% | 19.62% | -1.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.60% | 21.26% | -1.66% |
JHMM vs. MYY - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHMM has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than MYY's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHMM vs. MYY - Dividend Comparison
JHMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than MYY's 4.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF | 0.87% | 0.98% | 1.01% | 1.17% | 1.16% | 0.72% | 1.04% | 1.02% | 1.36% | 0.90% | 1.15% | 0.33% |
MYY ProShares Short S&P Mid Cap400 | 4.45% | 4.20% | 4.92% | 5.08% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 1.52% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JHMM and MYY have a correlation of -0.97, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MYY has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to JHMM (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHMM dropped -40.71% vs MYY's -95.08%.
On 10-year performance, JHMM leads with 11.91% vs -11.12% for MYY. On fees, JHMM is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, JHMM has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, JHMM has performed better with a 11.91% return vs -11.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JHMM is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MYY.
MYY has the higher dividend yield at 4.45%, compared with 0.87% for JHMM.
JHMM is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while MYY is Inverse Equities. JHMM tracks John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index, while MYY tracks S&P Mid Cap 400 (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Manulife and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for JHMM and 0.95% for MYY.
JHMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JHMM and MYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer