JHMM vs. MYY
JHMM (John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF) and MYY (ProShares Short S&P Mid Cap400) are both exchange-traded funds - JHMM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index, while MYY is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the S&P Mid Cap 400 (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JHMM returned 11.70%/yr vs -10.81%/yr for MYY. Their -0.96 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. JHMM charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for MYY.
Performance
JHMM vs. MYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHMM achieves a 14.90% return, which is significantly higher than MYY's -10.96% return. Over the past 10 years, JHMM has outperformed MYY with an annualized return of 11.70%, while MYY has yielded a comparatively lower -10.81% annualized return.
JHMM
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- 6M
- 9.00%
- YTD
- 14.90%
- 1Y
- 23.28%
- 3Y*
- 15.37%
- 5Y*
- 8.56%
- 10Y*
- 11.70%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.15%
MYY
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- 6M
- -7.74%
- YTD
- -10.96%
- 1Y
- -15.28%
- 3Y*
- -7.56%
- 5Y*
- -5.91%
- 10Y*
- -10.81%
- ALL TIME*
- -11.59%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $16.71M | $15.09M | $16.89M | |
| $319.02K | $183.72K | $161.47K |
JHMM vs. MYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF | 14.90% | 10.73% | 14.61% | 14.53% | -15.30% | 24.54% | 16.22% | 30.01% | -9.57% | 19.96% |
MYY ProShares Short S&P Mid Cap400 | -10.96% | -4.05% | -7.08% | -9.46% | 10.23% | -23.04% | -25.94% | -19.98% | 12.79% | -14.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHMM and MYY is -0.96, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2015 | -0.96 |
The correlation between JHMM and MYY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.98 to -0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHMM vs. MYY — Risk / Return Rank
JHMM
MYY
JHMM vs. MYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) and ProShares Short S&P Mid Cap400 (MYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JHMM | MYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 0.86 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | -0.77 | +3.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.42 | -1.35 | +11.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JHMM vs. MYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHMM drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, smaller than the maximum MYY drawdown of -95.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMM and MYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHMM | MYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.71% | -95.20% | +54.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.64% | -18.25% | +9.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.88% | -35.14% | +13.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.10% | -37.79% | +13.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.71% | -71.93% | +31.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -95.07% | +95.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.37% | -72.31% | +66.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 10.38% | -8.14% |
Volatility
JHMM vs. MYY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) is 3.16%, while ProShares Short S&P Mid Cap400 (MYY) has a volatility of 3.36%. This indicates that JHMM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MYY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHMM | MYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.16% | 3.36% | -0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.64% | 11.59% | -0.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.32% | 15.70% | -1.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.31% | 19.53% | -1.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.55% | 21.21% | -1.66% |
JHMM vs. MYY - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHMM has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than MYY's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHMM vs. MYY - Dividend Comparison
JHMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than MYY's 4.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF | 0.88% | 0.98% | 1.01% | 1.17% | 1.16% | 0.72% | 1.04% | 1.02% | 1.36% | 0.90% | 1.15% | 0.33% |
MYY ProShares Short S&P Mid Cap400 | 4.28% | 4.20% | 4.92% | 5.08% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 1.52% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JHMM and MYY have a correlation of -0.96, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MYY has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to JHMM (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHMM dropped -40.71% vs MYY's -95.20%.
On 10-year performance, JHMM leads with 11.70% vs -10.81% for MYY. On fees, JHMM is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, JHMM has been the lower-risk option at 3.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, JHMM has performed better with a 11.70% return vs -10.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JHMM is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MYY.
MYY has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 0.88% for JHMM.
JHMM is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while MYY is Inverse Equities. JHMM tracks John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index, while MYY tracks S&P Mid Cap 400 (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Manulife and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for JHMM and 0.95% for MYY.
JHMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JHMM and MYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer