PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHMM vs. JSMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHMM vs. JSMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) and Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHMM achieves a 13.68% return, which is significantly lower than JSMD's 17.41% return. Over the past 10 years, JHMM has underperformed JSMD with an annualized return of 11.64%, while JSMD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.14% annualized return.


JHMM

1D
0.52%
1M
0.06%
6M
7.64%
YTD
13.68%
1Y
21.68%
3Y*
14.57%
5Y*
8.98%
10Y*
11.64%

JSMD

1D
-1.39%
1M
-0.93%
6M
9.85%
YTD
17.41%
1Y
22.75%
3Y*
14.72%
5Y*
8.56%
10Y*
13.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHMM vs. JSMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JHMM
John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF
13.68%10.73%14.61%14.53%-15.30%24.54%16.22%30.01%-9.57%19.96%
JSMD
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
17.41%9.25%15.08%26.81%-22.84%8.40%30.79%31.05%-4.73%24.46%

Correlation

The correlation between JHMM and JSMD is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2016

0.88

The correlation between JHMM and JSMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

JHMM vs. JSMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JHMM
JSMD

Technology

19.3%
28.1%

Industrials

19.0%
23.3%

Financial Services

14.8%
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
8.7%

Healthcare

10.5%
18.7%

Real Estate

5.2%
2.8%

Utilities

5.1%

-

Energy

4.8%
1.1%

Basic Materials

4.1%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
2.5%

Communication Services

2.7%
2.9%

Technology

JHMM
19.3%
JSMD
28.1%

Industrials

JHMM
19.0%
JSMD
23.3%

Financial Services

JHMM
14.8%
JSMD
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

JHMM
10.8%
JSMD
8.7%

Healthcare

JHMM
10.5%
JSMD
18.7%

Real Estate

JHMM
5.2%
JSMD
2.8%

Utilities

JHMM
5.1%
JSMD

-

Energy

JHMM
4.8%
JSMD
1.1%

Basic Materials

JHMM
4.1%
JSMD
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

JHMM
3.6%
JSMD
2.5%

Communication Services

JHMM
2.7%
JSMD
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHMM vs. JSMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHMM
JHMM Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
JHMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHMM Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
JHMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHMM Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

JSMD
JSMD Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
JSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
JSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
JSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
JSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHMM vs. JSMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) and Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JHMMJSMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.19

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

1.54

+0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.67

5.12

+4.55

JHMM vs. JSMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHMM Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the JSMD Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHMM and JSMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JHMM vs. JSMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHMM drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, roughly equal to the maximum JSMD drawdown of -38.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMM and JSMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHMMJSMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.71%

-38.98%

-1.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.64%

-14.86%

+6.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.88%

-24.01%

+2.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.10%

-32.18%

+8.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.71%

-38.98%

-1.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.08%

-5.59%

+4.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.38%

-7.42%

+2.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

4.45%

-2.20%

Volatility

JHMM vs. JSMD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) is 3.29%, while Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) has a volatility of 6.01%. This indicates that JHMM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JSMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHMMJSMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

6.01%

-2.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.75%

17.49%

-6.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.35%

22.16%

-7.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.34%

23.09%

-4.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.54%

22.80%

-3.26%

JHMM vs. JSMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHMM has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than JSMD's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHMM vs. JSMD - Dividend Comparison

JHMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, more than JSMD's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JHMM
John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF
0.89%0.98%1.01%1.17%1.16%0.72%1.04%1.02%1.36%0.90%1.15%0.33%
JSMD
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
0.43%0.54%0.76%0.44%0.40%0.28%0.24%0.32%0.53%0.30%0.36%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHMM and JSMD have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JSMD has higher volatility (6.01%) compared to JHMM (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHMM dropped -40.71% vs JSMD's -38.98%.

On 10-year performance, JSMD leads with 13.14% vs 11.64% for JHMM. On fees, JSMD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, JHMM has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, JSMD has performed better with a 13.14% return vs 11.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JSMD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for JHMM.

JHMM has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.43% for JSMD.

JHMM tracks John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index, while JSMD tracks Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index. They also come from different issuers: Manulife and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for JHMM and 0.30% for JSMD.

JHMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHMM and JSMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer