JHMM vs. BMSLX
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) and MFS Blended Research Mid Cap Equity Fund (BMSLX).
JHMM is a passively managed fund by Manulife that tracks the performance of the John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index. It was launched on Sep 28, 2015. BMSLX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Aug 19, 2016.
Performance
JHMM vs. BMSLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JHMM vs. BMSLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF | 3.12% | 10.73% | 14.61% | 14.53% | -15.30% | 24.54% | 16.22% | 30.01% | -9.57% | 19.96% |
BMSLX MFS Blended Research Mid Cap Equity Fund | 0.41% | 8.08% | 19.25% | 19.81% | -13.70% | 26.54% | 10.44% | 30.21% | -11.11% | 18.04% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHMM achieves a 3.12% return, which is significantly higher than BMSLX's 0.41% return.
JHMM
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -5.20%
- YTD
- 3.12%
- 6M
- 4.94%
- 1Y
- 18.73%
- 3Y*
- 13.36%
- 5Y*
- 7.39%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
BMSLX
- 1D
- 2.76%
- 1M
- -5.47%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 6M
- -0.63%
- 1Y
- 11.68%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 8.92%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JHMM vs. BMSLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHMM has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than BMSLX's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JHMM vs. BMSLX — Risk / Return Rank
JHMM
BMSLX
JHMM vs. BMSLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) and MFS Blended Research Mid Cap Equity Fund (BMSLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JHMM | BMSLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.96 | 0.61 | +0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.46 | 0.99 | +0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.14 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | 0.88 | +0.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.22 | 3.53 | +2.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JHMM | BMSLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 0.61 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.49 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.54 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between JHMM and BMSLX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JHMM vs. BMSLX - Dividend Comparison
JHMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than BMSLX's 3.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF | 0.95% | 0.98% | 1.01% | 1.17% | 1.16% | 0.72% | 1.04% | 1.02% | 1.36% | 0.90% | 1.15% | 0.33% |
BMSLX MFS Blended Research Mid Cap Equity Fund | 3.07% | 3.08% | 10.98% | 2.32% | 5.15% | 23.06% | 0.94% | 4.90% | 8.27% | 2.63% | 0.47% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
JHMM vs. BMSLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHMM drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, roughly equal to the maximum BMSLX drawdown of -41.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMM and BMSLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHMM | BMSLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.71% | -41.06% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.57% | -14.24% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.10% | -22.28% | -1.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.58% | -6.65% | +1.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.50% | -5.12% | -0.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 3.57% | -0.51% |
Volatility
JHMM vs. BMSLX - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) and MFS Blended Research Mid Cap Equity Fund (BMSLX) have volatilities of 5.75% and 5.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JHMM | BMSLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.75% | 5.90% | -0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.93% | 10.98% | -0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.52% | 20.06% | -0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.30% | 18.41% | -0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.57% | 19.82% | -0.25% |