JHML vs. VEGN
JHML (John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF) and VEGN (US Vegan Climate ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - JHML tracks the John Hancock Dimensional Large Cap Index while VEGN tracks the US Vegan Climate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JHML returned 11.88%/yr vs 16.69%/yr for VEGN. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JHML charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for VEGN.
Performance
JHML vs. VEGN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHML achieves a 11.62% return, which is significantly lower than VEGN's 32.05% return.
JHML
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 4.79%
- YTD
- 11.62%
- 6M
- 11.80%
- 1Y
- 26.67%
- 3Y*
- 20.37%
- 5Y*
- 11.88%
- 10Y*
- 14.24%
VEGN
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 18.62%
- YTD
- 32.05%
- 6M
- 32.41%
- 1Y
- 50.54%
- 3Y*
- 30.01%
- 5Y*
- 16.69%
- 10Y*
- —
JHML vs. VEGN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHML John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF | 11.62% | 15.91% | 19.84% | 21.16% | -15.94% | 26.90% | 17.02% | 8.36% |
VEGN US Vegan Climate ETF | 32.05% | 13.71% | 25.42% | 38.10% | -26.87% | 26.01% | 27.72% | 9.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHML and VEGN is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2019 | 0.92 |
The correlation between JHML and VEGN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
JHML vs. VEGN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JHML
VEGN
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
JHML
VEGN
Financial Services
JHML
VEGN
Industrials
JHML
VEGN
Consumer Cyclical
JHML
VEGN
Healthcare
JHML
VEGN
Communication Services
JHML
VEGN
Consumer Defensive
JHML
VEGN
Energy
JHML
VEGN
-
Utilities
JHML
VEGN
Basic Materials
JHML
VEGN
Real Estate
JHML
VEGN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHML vs. VEGN — Risk / Return Rank
JHML
VEGN
JHML vs. VEGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) and US Vegan Climate ETF (VEGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JHML | VEGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.53 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | 4.29 | -0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.61 | 17.47 | -1.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JHML | VEGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34 | 3.13 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.83 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.86 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
JHML vs. VEGN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHML drawdown since its inception was -36.13%, which is greater than VEGN's maximum drawdown of -34.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHML and VEGN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHML | VEGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.13% | -34.14% | -1.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.95% | -11.85% | +3.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.20% | -20.91% | +2.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.47% | -33.40% | +9.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -0.64% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.29% | -7.59% | +3.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.71% | 2.90% | -1.19% |
Volatility
JHML vs. VEGN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) is 2.84%, while US Vegan Climate ETF (VEGN) has a volatility of 6.10%. This indicates that JHML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEGN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHML | VEGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.84% | 6.10% | -3.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.70% | 13.39% | -4.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.48% | 16.26% | -4.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.29% | 20.27% | -3.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.76% | 22.77% | -5.01% |
JHML vs. VEGN - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHML has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than VEGN's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHML vs. VEGN - Dividend Comparison
JHML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, more than VEGN's 0.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHML John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF | 0.95% | 1.06% | 1.16% | 1.39% | 1.46% | 1.08% | 1.59% | 1.73% | 1.57% | 1.44% | 1.36% | 0.38% |
VEGN US Vegan Climate ETF | 0.44% | 0.51% | 0.51% | 0.67% | 0.81% | 0.41% | 0.71% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JHML and VEGN have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VEGN has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to JHML (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHML dropped -36.13% vs VEGN's -34.14%.
On 5-year performance, VEGN leads with 16.69% vs 11.88% for JHML. On fees, JHML is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, JHML has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VEGN has performed better with a 16.69% return vs 11.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JHML is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for VEGN.
JHML has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.44% for VEGN.
JHML tracks John Hancock Dimensional Large Cap Index, while VEGN tracks US Vegan Climate Index. They also come from different issuers: Manulife and Beyond Investing. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for JHML and 0.60% for VEGN.
VEGN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JHML and VEGN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer