PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHML vs. USOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHML vs. USOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHML achieves a 11.62% return, which is significantly lower than USOY's 62.18% return.


JHML

1D
-0.45%
1M
4.79%
YTD
11.62%
6M
11.80%
1Y
26.67%
3Y*
20.37%
5Y*
11.88%
10Y*
14.24%

USOY

1D
1.45%
1M
-3.43%
YTD
62.18%
6M
59.35%
1Y
57.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHML vs. USOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
JHML
John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF
11.62%15.91%10.00%
USOY
Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF
62.18%-7.93%7.27%

Correlation

The correlation between JHML and USOY is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2024

-0.07

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between JHML and USOY has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.07 to -0.27, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHML vs. USOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHML
JHML Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
JHML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHML Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHML Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
JHML Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHML Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

USOY
USOY Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
USOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
USOY Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
USOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
USOY Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHML vs. USOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JHMLUSOYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.35

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

4.03

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.61

7.74

+7.87

JHML vs. USOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHML Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the USOY Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHML and USOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JHMLUSOYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

1.89

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.99

-0.18

Drawdowns

JHML vs. USOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHML drawdown since its inception was -36.13%, which is greater than USOY's maximum drawdown of -17.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHML and USOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHMLUSOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.13%

-17.46%

-18.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.95%

-14.29%

+6.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-5.11%

+4.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-6.47%

+2.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

7.42%

-5.71%

Volatility

JHML vs. USOY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) is 2.84%, while Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY) has a volatility of 11.62%. This indicates that JHML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHMLUSOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

11.62%

-8.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.70%

27.18%

-18.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.48%

30.44%

-18.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.29%

26.13%

-9.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.76%

26.13%

-8.37%

JHML vs. USOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHML has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than USOY's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHML vs. USOY - Dividend Comparison

JHML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than USOY's 54.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JHML
John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF
0.95%1.06%1.16%1.39%1.46%1.08%1.59%1.73%1.57%1.44%1.36%0.38%
USOY
Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF
54.16%104.32%48.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHML and USOY have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USOY has higher volatility (11.62%) compared to JHML (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHML dropped -36.13% vs USOY's -17.46%.

On 1-year performance, USOY leads with 57.29% vs 26.67% for JHML. On fees, JHML is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, JHML has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, USOY has performed better with a 57.29% return vs 26.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JHML is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.22% for USOY.

USOY has the higher dividend yield at 54.16%, compared with 0.95% for JHML.

JHML is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while USOY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Manulife and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for JHML and 1.22% for USOY.

JHML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHML and USOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer