PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHCB vs. JHCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHCB vs. JHCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB) and John Hancock Core Bond ETF (JHCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHCB achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly higher than JHCR's 0.32% return.


JHCB

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.63%
YTD
0.37%
6M
-0.08%
1Y
5.68%
3Y*
5.68%
5Y*
0.64%
10Y*

JHCR

1D
-0.30%
1M
0.21%
YTD
0.32%
6M
0.17%
1Y
5.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHCB vs. JHCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
JHCB
John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF
0.37%8.02%-0.26%
JHCR
John Hancock Core Bond ETF
0.32%7.54%-0.28%

Correlation

The correlation between JHCB and JHCR is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024

0.85

The correlation between JHCB and JHCR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHCB vs. JHCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHCB
JHCB Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
JHCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHCB Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
JHCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHCB Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

JHCR
JHCR Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
JHCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHCR Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
JHCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHCR Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHCB vs. JHCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB) and John Hancock Core Bond ETF (JHCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JHCBJHCRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.30

1.37

-0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.89

2.08

-0.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.25

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

2.02

-0.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.94

6.16

-0.22

JHCB vs. JHCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHCB Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the JHCR Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHCB and JHCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JHCBJHCRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

1.37

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

1.11

-0.96

Drawdowns

JHCB vs. JHCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHCB drawdown since its inception was -22.61%, which is greater than JHCR's maximum drawdown of -2.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHCB and JHCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHCBJHCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.61%

-2.85%

-19.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.16%

-2.84%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

-1.62%

+0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.21%

-0.77%

-7.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

0.93%

+0.03%

Volatility

JHCB vs. JHCR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB) is 1.42%, while John Hancock Core Bond ETF (JHCR) has a volatility of 1.51%. This indicates that JHCB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JHCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHCBJHCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

1.51%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.25%

3.11%

+0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.41%

4.19%

+0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.95%

4.69%

+2.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.88%

4.69%

+2.19%

JHCB vs. JHCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JHCB and JHCR have an expense ratio of 0.29%.


Dividends

JHCB vs. JHCR - Dividend Comparison

JHCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, more than JHCR's 4.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
JHCB
John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF
4.96%4.92%5.02%4.35%3.86%2.41%
JHCR
John Hancock Core Bond ETF
4.24%4.65%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHCB and JHCR have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JHCR has higher volatility (1.51%) compared to JHCB (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHCB dropped -22.61% vs JHCR's -2.85%.

On 1-year performance, JHCR leads with 5.73% vs 5.68% for JHCB. Both ETFs have the same 0.29% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JHCR has performed better with a 5.73% return vs 5.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JHCB and JHCR have the same expense ratio: 0.29% per year.

JHCB has the higher dividend yield at 4.96%, compared with 4.24% for JHCR.

JHCB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while JHCR is Intermediate Core Bond.

JHCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHCB and JHCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer