JHCB vs. JHCR
JHCB (John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF) and JHCR (John Hancock Core Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JHCB is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by John Hancock, while JHCR is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by John Hancock. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JHCB returned 4.93% vs 4.77% for JHCR. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.29% expense ratio.
Performance
JHCB vs. JHCR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHCB achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly higher than JHCR's 0.51% return.
JHCB
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- 0.75%
- 6M
- 0.72%
- 1Y
- 4.93%
- 3Y*
- 5.69%
- 5Y*
- 0.53%
- 10Y*
- —
JHCR
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 0.68%
- 1Y
- 4.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JHCB vs. JHCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
JHCB John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF | 0.75% | 8.02% | -1.33% |
JHCR John Hancock Core Bond ETF | 0.51% | 7.54% | -0.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHCB and JHCR is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2024 | 0.84 |
The correlation between JHCB and JHCR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHCB vs. JHCR — Risk / Return Rank
JHCB
JHCR
JHCB vs. JHCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB) and John Hancock Core Bond ETF (JHCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JHCB | JHCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.20 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 1.68 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.04 | 4.83 | +0.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JHCB vs. JHCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHCB drawdown since its inception was -22.61%, which is greater than JHCR's maximum drawdown of -2.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHCB and JHCR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHCB | JHCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.61% | -2.85% | -19.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.16% | -2.84% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -1.44% | +0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.13% | -0.84% | -7.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.98% | 0.99% | -0.01% |
Volatility
JHCB vs. JHCR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB) is 1.11%, while John Hancock Core Bond ETF (JHCR) has a volatility of 1.33%. This indicates that JHCB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JHCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHCB | JHCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.11% | 1.33% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.32% | 3.25% | +0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.36% | 4.21% | +0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.94% | 4.74% | +2.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.85% | 4.74% | +2.11% |
JHCB vs. JHCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both JHCB and JHCR have an expense ratio of 0.29%.
Dividends
JHCB vs. JHCR - Dividend Comparison
JHCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.94%, more than JHCR's 4.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHCB John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF | 4.94% | 4.92% | 5.02% | 4.35% | 3.86% | 2.41% |
JHCR John Hancock Core Bond ETF | 4.23% | 4.65% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JHCB and JHCR have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JHCR has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to JHCB (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHCB dropped -22.61% vs JHCR's -2.85%.
On 1-year performance, JHCB leads with 4.93% vs 4.77% for JHCR. Both ETFs have the same 0.29% expense ratio. On volatility, JHCB has been the lower-risk option at 1.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, JHCB has performed better with a 4.93% return vs 4.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JHCB and JHCR have the same expense ratio: 0.29% per year.
JHCB has the higher dividend yield at 4.94%, compared with 4.23% for JHCR.
JHCB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while JHCR is Intermediate Core Bond.
JHCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JHCB and JHCR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer