PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHCR vs. JHCP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHCR vs. JHCP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Core Bond ETF (JHCR) and John Hancock Core Plus Bond ETF (JHCP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with JHCR at -0.21% and JHCP at -0.21%.


JHCR

1D
-0.12%
1M
-1.15%
6M
-0.53%
YTD
-0.21%
1Y
2.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.83%

JHCP

1D
0.02%
1M
-1.13%
6M
-0.79%
YTD
-0.21%
1Y
2.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.40M$6.59M$2.64M
$7.61M$9.07M$5.44M

JHCR vs. JHCP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
JHCR
John Hancock Core Bond ETF
-0.21%7.54%-0.99%
JHCP
John Hancock Core Plus Bond ETF
-0.21%7.59%-1.05%

Correlation

The correlation between JHCR and JHCP is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2024

0.85

The correlation between JHCR and JHCP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHCR vs. JHCP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JHCR
JHCR Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
JHCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHCR Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
JHCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHCR Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

JHCP
JHCP Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
JHCP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHCP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHCP Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
JHCP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHCP Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JHCR vs. JHCP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Core Bond ETF (JHCR) and John Hancock Core Plus Bond ETF (JHCP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JHCRJHCPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.14

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

1.21

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.92

2.93

-0.01

JHCR vs. JHCP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHCR Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is comparable to the JHCP Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHCR and JHCP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JHCR vs. JHCP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHCR drawdown since its inception was -2.85%, smaller than the maximum JHCP drawdown of -3.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHCR and JHCP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHCRJHCPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.85%

-3.06%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.84%

-2.82%

-0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.14%

-2.10%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.88%

-0.93%

+0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.10%

1.16%

-0.06%

Volatility

JHCR vs. JHCP - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Core Bond ETF (JHCR) has a higher volatility of 1.18% compared to John Hancock Core Plus Bond ETF (JHCP) at 1.06%. This indicates that JHCR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHCP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHCRJHCPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.18%

1.06%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.41%

3.00%

+0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.19%

4.21%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.70%

4.79%

-0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.70%

4.79%

-0.09%

JHCR vs. JHCP - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHCR has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than JHCP's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHCR vs. JHCP - Dividend Comparison

JHCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, less than JHCP's 4.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
JHCP
John Hancock Core Plus Bond ETF
4.55%4.79%0.20%
JHCR
John Hancock Core Bond ETF
4.27%4.65%0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHCR and JHCP have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JHCR has higher volatility (1.18%) compared to JHCP (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHCR dropped -2.85% vs JHCP's -3.06%.

On 1-year performance, JHCP leads with 2.62% vs 2.35% for JHCR. On fees, JHCR is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, JHCP has been the lower-risk option at 1.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JHCP has performed better with a 2.62% return vs 2.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JHCR is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for JHCP.

JHCP has the higher dividend yield at 4.55%, compared with 4.27% for JHCR.

JHCR is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while JHCP is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for JHCR and 0.36% for JHCP.

JHCP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHCR and JHCP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer