PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHCB vs. FLOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

JHCB vs. FLOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB) and iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

JHCB vs. FLOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
JHCB
John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF
-0.63%8.02%2.75%8.89%-15.93%3.41%
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
0.74%4.91%6.53%6.43%1.28%0.24%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHCB achieves a -0.63% return, which is significantly lower than FLOT's 0.74% return.


JHCB

1D
0.71%
1M
-2.01%
YTD
-0.63%
6M
-0.12%
1Y
4.75%
3Y*
5.13%
5Y*
0.77%
10Y*

FLOT

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.10%
YTD
0.74%
6M
1.86%
1Y
4.44%
3Y*
5.87%
5Y*
4.01%
10Y*
2.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


JHCB vs. FLOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHCB has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FLOT's 0.20% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

JHCB vs. FLOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHCB
JHCB Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
JHCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHCB Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
JHCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHCB Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

FLOT
FLOT Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FLOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLOT Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
FLOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLOT Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHCB vs. FLOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB) and iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JHCBFLOTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.85

2.10

-1.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.16

2.64

-1.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.95

-0.79

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

2.88

-1.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.00

22.41

-18.41

JHCB vs. FLOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHCB Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the FLOT Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHCB and FLOT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JHCBFLOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

2.10

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

2.27

-2.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.64

-0.52

Correlation

The correlation between JHCB and FLOT is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

JHCB vs. FLOT - Dividend Comparison

JHCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, more than FLOT's 4.68% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JHCB
John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF
4.99%4.92%5.02%4.35%3.86%2.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
4.68%4.84%5.82%5.66%2.06%0.43%1.25%2.78%2.41%1.46%0.97%0.53%

Drawdowns

JHCB vs. FLOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHCB drawdown since its inception was -22.61%, which is greater than FLOT's maximum drawdown of -13.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHCB and FLOT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


JHCBFLOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.61%

-13.54%

-9.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.16%

-1.57%

-2.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.61%

-2.36%

-20.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.02%

-0.16%

-1.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.45%

-0.21%

-8.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.21%

0.20%

+1.01%

Volatility

JHCB vs. FLOT - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB) has a higher volatility of 2.26% compared to iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) at 0.50%. This indicates that JHCB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


JHCBFLOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.26%

0.50%

+1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.12%

0.61%

+2.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.62%

2.12%

+3.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.95%

1.77%

+5.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.95%

4.15%

+2.80%