JGRO vs. OUSA
JGRO (JPMorgan Active Growth ETF) and OUSA (OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while OUSA is a Quality Factor fund tracking the O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index. JGRO is actively managed, while OUSA is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JGRO returned 19.92%/yr vs 14.04%/yr for OUSA. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. JGRO charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for OUSA.
Performance
JGRO vs. OUSA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JGRO achieves a 3.38% return, which is significantly lower than OUSA's 8.45% return.
JGRO
- 1D
- 2.76%
- 1M
- 1.09%
- 6M
- 6.42%
- YTD
- 3.38%
- 1Y
- 8.79%
- 3Y*
- 19.92%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 18.12%
OUSA
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 3.71%
- 6M
- 5.67%
- YTD
- 8.45%
- 1Y
- 16.10%
- 3Y*
- 14.04%
- 5Y*
- 9.18%
- 10Y*
- 10.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.85%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $81.20M | $58.99M | $60.97M | |
| $880.04K | $1.30M | $1.44M |
JGRO vs. OUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JGRO JPMorgan Active Growth ETF | 3.38% | 14.71% | 32.77% | 37.74% | -10.43% |
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF | 8.45% | 10.23% | 17.09% | 13.44% | -0.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between JGRO and OUSA is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022 | 0.63 |
Over the past year, the correlation between JGRO and OUSA has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
JGRO vs. OUSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JGRO
OUSA
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
JGRO
OUSA
Communication Services
JGRO
OUSA
Industrials
JGRO
OUSA
Healthcare
JGRO
OUSA
Consumer Cyclical
JGRO
OUSA
Financial Services
JGRO
OUSA
Consumer Defensive
JGRO
OUSA
Energy
JGRO
OUSA
-
Utilities
JGRO
OUSA
-
Basic Materials
JGRO
OUSA
-
Real Estate
JGRO
OUSA
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JGRO vs. OUSA — Risk / Return Rank
JGRO
OUSA
JGRO vs. OUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Active Growth ETF (JGRO) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JGRO | OUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.28 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.54 | 1.93 | -1.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.51 | 6.75 | -5.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JGRO vs. OUSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JGRO drawdown since its inception was -22.70%, smaller than the maximum OUSA drawdown of -33.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGRO and OUSA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JGRO | OUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.70% | -33.12% | +10.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.44% | -8.36% | -8.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.70% | -13.14% | -9.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.58% | 0.00% | -3.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.84% | -3.50% | -1.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.84% | 2.39% | +3.45% |
Volatility
JGRO vs. OUSA - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Active Growth ETF (JGRO) has a higher volatility of 7.80% compared to OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) at 3.81%. This indicates that JGRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JGRO | OUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.80% | 3.81% | +3.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.92% | 8.12% | +6.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.32% | 10.31% | +8.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.21% | 13.39% | +6.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.21% | 15.20% | +5.01% |
JGRO vs. OUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison
JGRO has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than OUSA's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
JGRO vs. OUSA - Dividend Comparison
JGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than OUSA's 1.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JGRO JPMorgan Active Growth ETF | 0.15% | 0.16% | 0.10% | 0.17% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF | 1.33% | 1.39% | 1.50% | 1.81% | 1.92% | 1.56% | 2.03% | 2.31% | 3.06% | 2.15% | 2.32% | 1.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JGRO and OUSA have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JGRO has higher volatility (7.80%) compared to OUSA (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JGRO dropped -22.70% vs OUSA's -33.12%.
On 3-year performance, JGRO leads with 19.92% vs 14.04% for OUSA. On fees, JGRO is cheaper at 0.44% per year. On volatility, OUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, JGRO has performed better with a 19.92% return vs 14.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JGRO is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OUSA.
OUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.15% for JGRO.
JGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while OUSA is Quality Factor. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and O'Shares Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for JGRO and 0.48% for OUSA.
OUSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JGRO and OUSA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer