JGRO vs. MFUS

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

JGRO (JPMorgan Active Growth ETF) and MFUS (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. JGRO is actively managed, while MFUS is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JGRO returned 19.92%/yr vs 20.74%/yr for MFUS. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. JGRO charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for MFUS.

Performance

JGRO vs. MFUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Active Growth ETF (JGRO) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JGRO achieves a 3.38% return, which is significantly lower than MFUS's 18.83% return.

JGRO

• 1D: 2.76%
• 1M: 1.09%
• 6M: 6.42%
• YTD: 3.38%
• 1Y: 8.79%
• 3Y*: 19.92%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.12%

MFUS

• 1D: 1.95%
• 1M: 1.60%
• 6M: 12.71%
• YTD: 18.83%
• 1Y: 26.88%
• 3Y*: 20.74%
• 5Y*: 13.31%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
JGRO JPMorgan Active Growth ETF	$81.20M	$58.99M	$60.97M
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF	$1.13M	$1.05M	$961.83K

JGRO vs. MFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
JGRO JPMorgan Active Growth ETF	3.38%	14.71%	32.77%	37.74%	-10.43%
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF	18.83%	16.02%	20.17%	12.19%	1.24%

Correlation

The correlation between JGRO and MFUS is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022	0.74

The correlation between JGRO and MFUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

JGRO vs. MFUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JGRO	MFUS
Technology	49.6%	25.8%
Communication Services	13.5%	4.6%
Industrials	8.9%	12.5%
Healthcare	8.3%	14.7%
Consumer Cyclical	5.3%	9.3%
Financial Services	4.8%	11.3%
Consumer Defensive	3.2%	9.3%
Energy	1.8%	6.6%
Utilities	0.9%	1.3%
Basic Materials	0.4%	2.5%
Real Estate	0.3%	2.0%

Return for Risk

JGRO vs. MFUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JGRO

JGRO Risk / Return Rank: 20
JGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
JGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
JGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 20
JGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
JGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 20

MFUS

MFUS Risk / Return Rank: 89
MFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
MFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
MFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 88
MFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
MFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JGRO vs. MFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Active Growth ETF (JGRO) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JGRO	MFUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.48	2.35	-1.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.80	3.38	-2.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.43	-0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.54	4.23	-3.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.51	15.97	-14.46

JGRO vs. MFUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JGRO Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the MFUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JGRO and MFUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JGRO vs. MFUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JGRO drawdown since its inception was -22.70%, smaller than the maximum MFUS drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGRO and MFUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	JGRO	MFUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.70%	-35.21%	+12.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.44%	-6.39%	-10.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.70%	-15.39%	-7.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.58%	-0.27%	-3.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.84%	-3.95%	-0.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.84%	1.69%	+4.15%

Volatility

JGRO vs. MFUS - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Active Growth ETF (JGRO) has a higher volatility of 7.80% compared to PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) at 3.49%. This indicates that JGRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JGRO	MFUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.80%	3.49%	+4.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.92%	9.26%	+5.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.32%	11.53%	+6.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.21%	15.03%	+5.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.21%	17.29%	+2.92%

JGRO vs. MFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

JGRO has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than MFUS's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

JGRO vs. MFUS - Dividend Comparison

JGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than MFUS's 1.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JGRO JPMorgan Active Growth ETF	0.15%	0.16%	0.10%	0.17%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF	1.35%	1.54%	1.45%	1.96%	2.07%	1.35%	1.72%	1.89%	1.69%	1.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JGRO and MFUS in my portfolio?

JGRO and MFUS have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JGRO or MFUS?

JGRO has higher volatility (7.80%) compared to MFUS (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JGRO dropped -22.70% vs MFUS's -35.21%.

Which ETF is better, JGRO or MFUS?

On 3-year performance, MFUS leads with 20.74% vs 19.92% for JGRO. On fees, MFUS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, MFUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JGRO or MFUS?

Over the 3-year period, MFUS has performed better with a 20.74% return vs 19.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JGRO or MFUS?

MFUS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for JGRO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JGRO or MFUS?

MFUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.15% for JGRO.

What is the main difference between JGRO and MFUS?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for JGRO and 0.30% for MFUS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.