PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JGMNX vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JGMNX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class N (JGMNX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with JGMNX having a 11.44% return and VOO slightly higher at 11.69%. Over the past 10 years, JGMNX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 10.36%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.65% annualized return.


JGMNX

1D
-0.52%
1M
2.29%
YTD
11.44%
6M
12.19%
1Y
26.81%
3Y*
13.39%
5Y*
4.29%
10Y*
10.36%

VOO

1D
0.14%
1M
5.39%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.11%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JGMNX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JGMNX
Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class N
11.44%9.78%10.55%14.83%-23.56%6.88%28.75%28.60%-5.03%27.24%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.69%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between JGMNX and VOO is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2012

0.85

The correlation between JGMNX and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JGMNX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JGMNX
JGMNX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
JGMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
JGMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JGMNX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class N (JGMNX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JGMNXVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.69

2.53

-0.85

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.46

3.43

-0.97

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.46

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

3.42

-0.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.10

15.95

-5.85

JGMNX vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JGMNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JGMNX and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JGMNXVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

2.53

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.85

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.87

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.89

-0.30

Drawdowns

JGMNX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JGMNX drawdown since its inception was -39.72%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGMNX and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JGMNXVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.72%

-33.99%

-5.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.03%

-8.90%

-2.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.84%

-18.69%

-5.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.74%

-24.52%

-7.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.72%

-33.99%

-5.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

0.00%

-1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.14%

-3.69%

-3.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

1.91%

+0.76%

Volatility

JGMNX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class N (JGMNX) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.74%. This indicates that JGMNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JGMNXVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.21%

2.74%

+2.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.43%

8.88%

+3.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.11%

11.78%

+4.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.60%

16.81%

+2.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.58%

18.01%

+2.57%

JGMNX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

JGMNX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

JGMNX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

JGMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.75%, more than VOO's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JGMNX
Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class N
9.75%10.86%7.35%6.96%6.10%19.99%4.06%4.20%7.41%5.03%2.96%7.71%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


JGMNX and VOO have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JGMNX has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to VOO (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JGMNX dropped -39.72% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JGMNX and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer