PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JGMNX vs. JNRFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JGMNX vs. JNRFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class N (JGMNX) and Janus Henderson Research Fund Class D (JNRFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JGMNX achieves a 14.19% return, which is significantly higher than JNRFX's 1.17% return. Over the past 10 years, JGMNX has underperformed JNRFX with an annualized return of 10.25%, while JNRFX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.41% annualized return.


JGMNX

1D
0.74%
1M
-2.44%
6M
10.78%
YTD
14.19%
1Y
23.60%
3Y*
12.00%
5Y*
4.32%
10Y*
10.25%
ALL TIME*
11.33%

JNRFX

1D
3.40%
1M
-3.24%
6M
2.53%
YTD
1.17%
1Y
8.03%
3Y*
20.23%
5Y*
11.31%
10Y*
15.41%
ALL TIME*
9.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JGMNX vs. JNRFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JGMNX
Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class N
14.19%9.78%10.55%14.83%-23.56%6.88%28.75%28.60%-5.03%27.24%
JNRFX
Janus Henderson Research Fund Class D
1.17%18.45%35.13%43.14%-29.96%20.19%32.82%35.40%-2.73%25.90%

Correlation

The correlation between JGMNX and JNRFX is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2012

0.82

The correlation between JGMNX and JNRFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JGMNX vs. JNRFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JGMNX
JGMNX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
JGMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
JGMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

JNRFX
JNRFX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
JNRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
JNRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JGMNX vs. JNRFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class N (JGMNX) and Janus Henderson Research Fund Class D (JNRFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JGMNXJNRFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.07

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

0.35

+1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.70

1.13

+6.56

JGMNX vs. JNRFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JGMNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is higher than the JNRFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JGMNX and JNRFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JGMNX vs. JNRFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JGMNX drawdown since its inception was -39.72%, smaller than the maximum JNRFX drawdown of -74.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGMNX and JNRFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JGMNXJNRFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.72%

-74.74%

+35.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.03%

-17.05%

+6.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.84%

-22.66%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.74%

-36.48%

+4.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.72%

-36.48%

-3.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.17%

-7.61%

+4.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.07%

-24.86%

+17.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

5.33%

-2.61%

Volatility

JGMNX vs. JNRFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class N (JGMNX) is 3.51%, while Janus Henderson Research Fund Class D (JNRFX) has a volatility of 6.93%. This indicates that JGMNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JNRFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JGMNXJNRFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.51%

6.93%

-3.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.35%

15.29%

-1.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.79%

18.48%

-1.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.69%

22.44%

-2.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.55%

21.49%

-0.94%

JGMNX vs. JNRFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JGMNX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than JNRFX's 0.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

JGMNX vs. JNRFX - Dividend Comparison

JGMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.51%, less than JNRFX's 11.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JGMNX
Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class N
9.51%10.86%7.35%6.96%6.10%19.99%4.06%4.20%7.41%5.03%2.96%7.71%
JNRFX
Janus Henderson Research Fund Class D
11.80%11.94%5.11%2.93%0.43%13.01%2.98%10.37%11.06%8.22%5.41%9.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


JGMNX and JNRFX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JNRFX has higher volatility (6.93%) compared to JGMNX (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JGMNX dropped -39.72% vs JNRFX's -74.74%.

JGMNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JGMNX and JNRFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer