JGLTX vs. JGMNX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX) and Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class N (JGMNX).
JGLTX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Jan 17, 2000. JGMNX is a passively managed fund by Janus Henderson that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Growth Index. It was launched on May 31, 2012.
Performance
JGLTX vs. JGMNX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JGLTX vs. JGMNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JGLTX Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio | -7.02% | 25.19% | 32.10% | 54.55% | -36.42% | 18.28% | 50.42% | 45.29% | 1.17% | 45.17% |
JGMNX Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class N | -1.36% | 9.78% | 10.55% | 14.83% | -23.56% | 6.88% | 28.75% | 28.60% | -5.03% | 27.24% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JGLTX achieves a -7.02% return, which is significantly lower than JGMNX's -1.36% return. Over the past 10 years, JGLTX has outperformed JGMNX with an annualized return of 20.70%, while JGMNX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.51% annualized return.
JGLTX
- 1D
- 3.97%
- 1M
- -7.40%
- YTD
- -7.02%
- 6M
- -6.55%
- 1Y
- 27.79%
- 3Y*
- 24.91%
- 5Y*
- 11.25%
- 10Y*
- 20.70%
JGMNX
- 1D
- 3.90%
- 1M
- -6.17%
- YTD
- -1.36%
- 6M
- 3.66%
- 1Y
- 16.46%
- 3Y*
- 8.88%
- 5Y*
- 1.89%
- 10Y*
- 9.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JGLTX vs. JGMNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JGLTX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than JGMNX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JGLTX vs. JGMNX — Risk / Return Rank
JGLTX
JGMNX
JGLTX vs. JGMNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX) and Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class N (JGMNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JGLTX | JGMNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.17 | 0.80 | +0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.74 | 1.27 | +0.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.17 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 1.16 | +0.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.15 | 4.81 | +1.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JGLTX | JGMNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 0.80 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.10 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | 0.46 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.55 | -0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between JGLTX and JGMNX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JGLTX vs. JGMNX - Dividend Comparison
JGLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.66%, less than JGMNX's 11.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JGLTX Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio | 9.66% | 8.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 26.96% | 14.48% | 7.71% | 6.81% | 4.95% | 5.68% | 3.71% | 16.11% |
JGMNX Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class N | 11.01% | 10.86% | 7.35% | 6.96% | 6.10% | 19.99% | 4.06% | 4.20% | 7.41% | 5.03% | 2.96% | 7.71% |
Drawdowns
JGLTX vs. JGMNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JGLTX drawdown since its inception was -81.78%, which is greater than JGMNX's maximum drawdown of -39.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGLTX and JGMNX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JGLTX | JGMNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.78% | -39.72% | -42.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.81% | -13.18% | -2.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.18% | -31.74% | -13.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.18% | -39.72% | -5.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.47% | -7.56% | -4.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.82% | -7.20% | -29.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.65% | 3.17% | +1.48% |
Volatility
JGLTX vs. JGMNX - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX) has a higher volatility of 8.22% compared to Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class N (JGMNX) at 7.35%. This indicates that JGLTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JGMNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JGLTX | JGMNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.22% | 7.35% | +0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.11% | 11.97% | +4.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.28% | 20.44% | +4.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.93% | 19.50% | +6.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.31% | 20.53% | +3.78% |