PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JGLTX vs. JAGLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JGLTX vs. JAGLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX) and Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class T (JAGLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JGLTX achieves a 17.82% return, which is significantly higher than JAGLX's 9.46% return. Over the past 10 years, JGLTX has outperformed JAGLX with an annualized return of 22.24%, while JAGLX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.69% annualized return.


JGLTX

1D
6.78%
1M
-6.31%
6M
15.26%
YTD
17.82%
1Y
26.94%
3Y*
28.28%
5Y*
14.27%
10Y*
22.24%
ALL TIME*
8.28%

JAGLX

1D
-0.67%
1M
-1.72%
6M
8.62%
YTD
9.46%
1Y
41.01%
3Y*
15.10%
5Y*
9.59%
10Y*
11.69%
ALL TIME*
11.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JGLTX vs. JAGLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JGLTX
Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio
17.82%25.19%32.10%54.55%-36.42%18.28%50.42%45.29%1.17%45.17%
JAGLX
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class T
9.46%24.72%8.50%7.41%-2.79%6.66%25.52%29.12%4.05%22.13%

Correlation

The correlation between JGLTX and JAGLX is 0.10, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2000

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between JGLTX and JAGLX has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JGLTX vs. JAGLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JGLTX
JGLTX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
JGLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
JGLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

JAGLX
JAGLX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
JAGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
JAGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JGLTX vs. JAGLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX) and Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class T (JAGLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JGLTXJAGLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.43

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

4.08

-2.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.29

12.74

-8.45

JGLTX vs. JAGLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JGLTX Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the JAGLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JGLTX and JAGLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JGLTX vs. JAGLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JGLTX drawdown since its inception was -81.78%, which is greater than JAGLX's maximum drawdown of -58.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGLTX and JAGLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JGLTXJAGLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.78%

-58.96%

-22.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.76%

-9.71%

-9.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.72%

-17.41%

-6.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.18%

-22.25%

-22.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.18%

-27.38%

-17.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.26%

-2.51%

-10.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.42%

-17.34%

-19.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.61%

3.10%

+2.51%

Volatility

JGLTX vs. JAGLX - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX) has a higher volatility of 12.57% compared to Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class T (JAGLX) at 5.23%. This indicates that JGLTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JAGLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JGLTXJAGLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.57%

5.23%

+7.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.74%

12.28%

+11.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.93%

15.75%

+11.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.21%

16.17%

+11.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.02%

17.40%

+7.62%

JGLTX vs. JAGLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JGLTX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than JAGLX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

JGLTX vs. JAGLX - Dividend Comparison

JGLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.92%, more than JAGLX's 4.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JAGLX
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class T
4.14%4.53%10.98%4.22%0.14%9.78%7.75%6.17%13.38%0.89%1.13%9.09%
JGLTX
Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio
11.92%8.98%0.00%0.00%26.96%14.48%7.71%6.81%4.95%5.68%3.71%16.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


JGLTX and JAGLX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JGLTX has higher volatility (12.57%) compared to JAGLX (5.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JGLTX dropped -81.78% vs JAGLX's -58.96%.

JAGLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JGLTX and JAGLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer