PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JFR vs. TYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JFR vs. TYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund (JFR) and Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JFR achieves a 2.59% return, which is significantly lower than TYG's 12.01% return. Over the past 10 years, JFR has outperformed TYG with an annualized return of 5.84%, while TYG has yielded a comparatively lower -1.33% annualized return.


JFR

1D
0.26%
1M
2.79%
YTD
2.59%
6M
3.06%
1Y
3.83%
3Y*
11.93%
5Y*
5.93%
10Y*
5.84%

TYG

1D
-0.71%
1M
-11.93%
YTD
12.01%
6M
7.96%
1Y
18.59%
3Y*
27.88%
5Y*
19.30%
10Y*
-1.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JFR vs. TYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JFR
Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund
2.59%-0.68%21.92%16.61%-15.15%24.66%-8.05%19.65%-11.69%2.94%
TYG
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund
12.01%8.46%60.18%-0.37%24.20%46.86%-70.31%1.79%-24.74%3.17%

Correlation

The correlation between JFR and TYG is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2004

0.27

The correlation between JFR and TYG shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JFR vs. TYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JFR
JFR Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
JFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
JFR Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
JFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
JFR Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

TYG
TYG Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
TYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
TYG Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
TYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
TYG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JFR vs. TYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund (JFR) and Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JFRTYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.19

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.45

1.52

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.16

5.02

-3.87

JFR vs. TYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JFR Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the TYG Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JFR and TYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JFRTYGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

0.96

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.81

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

-0.03

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.09

+0.18

Drawdowns

JFR vs. TYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JFR drawdown since its inception was -62.61%, smaller than the maximum TYG drawdown of -95.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JFR and TYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JFRTYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.61%

-95.34%

+32.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.62%

-12.30%

+3.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.29%

-25.08%

+9.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.40%

-25.08%

+4.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.71%

-94.98%

+47.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-36.11%

+35.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.79%

-29.42%

+20.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

3.71%

-0.39%

Volatility

JFR vs. TYG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund (JFR) is 1.71%, while Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG) has a volatility of 7.20%. This indicates that JFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JFRTYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.71%

7.20%

-5.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.07%

17.27%

-10.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.52%

19.45%

-10.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.81%

24.05%

-11.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.65%

51.15%

-34.50%

JFR vs. TYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

JFR has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than TYG's 2.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

JFR vs. TYG - Dividend Comparison

JFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.11%, which matches TYG's 13.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JFR
Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund
13.11%13.03%11.43%11.51%9.61%6.66%7.19%7.19%7.95%7.23%6.38%7.03%
TYG
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund
13.05%11.25%7.96%9.87%8.94%5.27%10.85%14.61%13.17%9.01%8.54%13.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


JFR and TYG have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TYG has higher volatility (7.20%) compared to JFR (1.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JFR dropped -62.61% vs TYG's -95.34%.

TYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JFR and TYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer