JFR vs. JQC
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund (JFR) and Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund (JQC).
JFR is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Mar 24, 2004. JQC is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Jun 26, 2003.
Performance
JFR vs. JQC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JFR vs. JQC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JFR Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund | -1.74% | -0.68% | 21.92% | 16.61% | -15.15% | 24.66% | -8.05% | 19.65% | -11.69% | 2.94% |
JQC Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund | -0.69% | -0.36% | 22.29% | 15.26% | -14.22% | 13.29% | -2.96% | 21.78% | -4.33% | -0.27% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JFR achieves a -1.74% return, which is significantly lower than JQC's -0.69% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JFR having a 6.03% annualized return and JQC not far ahead at 6.15%.
JFR
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- YTD
- -1.74%
- 6M
- -2.50%
- 1Y
- -0.48%
- 3Y*
- 9.26%
- 5Y*
- 5.35%
- 10Y*
- 6.03%
JQC
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- YTD
- -0.69%
- 6M
- -3.79%
- 1Y
- 2.42%
- 3Y*
- 10.57%
- 5Y*
- 4.84%
- 10Y*
- 6.15%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JFR vs. JQC - Expense Ratio Comparison
JFR has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than JQC's 4.34% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JFR vs. JQC — Risk / Return Rank
JFR
JQC
JFR vs. JQC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund (JFR) and Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund (JQC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JFR | JQC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | 0.16 | -0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.04 | 0.33 | -0.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.05 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 0.16 | -0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.07 | 0.35 | -0.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JFR | JQC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 | 0.16 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.37 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.35 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.23 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between JFR and JQC is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
JFR vs. JQC - Dividend Comparison
JFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.60%, more than JQC's 13.32% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JFR Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund | 13.60% | 13.03% | 11.43% | 11.51% | 9.61% | 6.66% | 7.19% | 7.19% | 7.95% | 7.23% | 6.38% | 7.03% |
JQC Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund | 13.32% | 12.91% | 11.39% | 11.42% | 9.71% | 10.03% | 16.11% | 16.14% | 6.53% | 7.42% | 6.99% | 7.51% |
Drawdowns
JFR vs. JQC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JFR drawdown since its inception was -62.61%, smaller than the maximum JQC drawdown of -75.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JFR and JQC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JFR | JQC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.61% | -75.18% | +12.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.33% | -10.15% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.40% | -19.83% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.71% | -47.99% | +0.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.05% | -6.67% | +1.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.84% | -8.84% | 0.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 4.67% | -1.13% |
Volatility
JFR vs. JQC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund (JFR) is 5.01%, while Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund (JQC) has a volatility of 6.02%. This indicates that JFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JQC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JFR | JQC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.01% | 6.02% | -1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.02% | 9.36% | -2.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.19% | 15.57% | -2.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.74% | 13.12% | -0.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.65% | 17.56% | -0.91% |