JFR vs. EHI
JFR (Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund) and EHI (Western Asset Global High Income Fund Inc) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, JFR returned 5.89%/yr vs 4.86%/yr for EHI. Their 0.36 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. JFR charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for EHI.
Performance
JFR vs. EHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JFR achieves a 6.22% return, which is significantly higher than EHI's -1.81% return. Over the past 10 years, JFR has outperformed EHI with an annualized return of 5.89%, while EHI has yielded a comparatively lower 4.86% annualized return.
JFR
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- 6M
- 4.95%
- YTD
- 6.22%
- 1Y
- 3.12%
- 3Y*
- 11.26%
- 5Y*
- 6.35%
- 10Y*
- 5.89%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.94%
EHI
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- -1.67%
- 6M
- -4.21%
- YTD
- -1.81%
- 1Y
- 0.68%
- 3Y*
- 6.64%
- 5Y*
- 0.34%
- 10Y*
- 4.86%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.08%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $546.17K | $510.41K | $547.28K | |
| $3.86M | $3.71M | $4.50M |
JFR vs. EHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JFR Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund | 6.22% | -0.68% | 21.92% | 16.61% | -15.15% | 24.66% | -8.05% | 19.65% | -11.69% | 2.94% |
EHI Western Asset Global High Income Fund Inc | -1.81% | 9.15% | 5.63% | 19.22% | -25.22% | 9.37% | 8.81% | 30.98% | -12.35% | 13.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between JFR and EHI is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2004 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JFR vs. EHI — Risk / Return Rank
JFR
EHI
JFR vs. EHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund (JFR) and Western Asset Global High Income Fund Inc (EHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JFR | EHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.02 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | 0.07 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.94 | 0.20 | +0.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JFR vs. EHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JFR drawdown since its inception was -62.61%, which is greater than EHI's maximum drawdown of -58.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JFR and EHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JFR | EHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.61% | -58.50% | -4.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.62% | -9.14% | +0.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.29% | -15.98% | +0.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.40% | -32.90% | +12.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.71% | -36.30% | -11.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.95% | +4.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.73% | -8.13% | -0.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.32% | 3.34% | -0.02% |
Volatility
JFR vs. EHI - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund (JFR) has a higher volatility of 1.83% compared to Western Asset Global High Income Fund Inc (EHI) at 1.74%. This indicates that JFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JFR | EHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.83% | 1.74% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.02% | 6.86% | +0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.64% | 8.80% | -0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.72% | 13.86% | -1.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.61% | 14.37% | +2.24% |
JFR vs. EHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
JFR has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is higher than EHI's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
JFR vs. EHI - Dividend Comparison
JFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.74%, less than EHI's 14.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EHI Western Asset Global High Income Fund Inc | 14.46% | 13.10% | 12.37% | 11.12% | 11.82% | 7.95% | 8.02% | 7.52% | 8.91% | 8.32% | 11.58% | 13.25% |
JFR Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund | 12.74% | 13.03% | 11.43% | 11.51% | 9.61% | 6.66% | 7.19% | 7.19% | 7.95% | 7.23% | 6.38% | 7.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JFR and EHI have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JFR has higher volatility (1.83%) compared to EHI (1.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JFR dropped -62.61% vs EHI's -58.50%.
JFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.36 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JFR and EHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer