PHSTX vs. FSMEX
Compare and contrast key facts about Putnam Global Health Care Fund (PHSTX) and Fidelity Select Medical Technology and Devices Portfolio (FSMEX).
PHSTX is managed by Putnam. It was launched on May 27, 1982. FSMEX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 28, 1998.
Performance
PHSTX vs. FSMEX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PHSTX vs. FSMEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHSTX Putnam Global Health Care Fund | -5.20% | 15.20% | 1.35% | 9.11% | -4.88% | 19.60% | 15.94% | 30.26% | -0.76% | 15.30% |
FSMEX Fidelity Select Medical Technology and Devices Portfolio | -17.58% | 8.13% | 18.37% | 0.62% | -24.84% | 24.56% | 30.18% | 29.58% | 15.98% | 26.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHSTX achieves a -5.20% return, which is significantly higher than FSMEX's -17.58% return. Over the past 10 years, PHSTX has underperformed FSMEX with an annualized return of 8.86%, while FSMEX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.46% annualized return.
PHSTX
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -9.12%
- YTD
- -5.20%
- 6M
- 5.37%
- 1Y
- 3.92%
- 3Y*
- 7.27%
- 5Y*
- 6.39%
- 10Y*
- 8.86%
FSMEX
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -11.19%
- YTD
- -17.58%
- 6M
- -11.01%
- 1Y
- -8.83%
- 3Y*
- 0.36%
- 5Y*
- -0.71%
- 10Y*
- 10.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PHSTX vs. FSMEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHSTX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMEX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PHSTX vs. FSMEX — Risk / Return Rank
PHSTX
FSMEX
PHSTX vs. FSMEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Global Health Care Fund (PHSTX) and Fidelity Select Medical Technology and Devices Portfolio (FSMEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PHSTX | FSMEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.24 | -0.41 | +0.65 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.45 | -0.46 | +0.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 0.94 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.35 | -0.48 | +0.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.82 | -1.55 | +2.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PHSTX | FSMEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 | -0.41 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | -0.03 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.51 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.65 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between PHSTX and FSMEX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PHSTX vs. FSMEX - Dividend Comparison
PHSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than FSMEX's 12.78% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHSTX Putnam Global Health Care Fund | 1.88% | 1.79% | 4.92% | 5.62% | 7.82% | 11.98% | 9.58% | 5.72% | 6.82% | 17.31% | 10.65% | 13.06% |
FSMEX Fidelity Select Medical Technology and Devices Portfolio | 12.78% | 10.53% | 17.04% | 0.00% | 1.80% | 8.12% | 6.65% | 1.77% | 7.47% | 6.26% | 5.84% | 16.35% |
Drawdowns
PHSTX vs. FSMEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHSTX drawdown since its inception was -45.51%, which is greater than FSMEX's maximum drawdown of -40.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHSTX and FSMEX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHSTX | FSMEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.51% | -40.34% | -5.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.02% | -21.04% | +11.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.71% | -40.34% | +19.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.51% | -40.34% | +14.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.12% | -22.82% | +13.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.93% | -7.66% | -2.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.74% | 6.50% | -1.76% |
Volatility
PHSTX vs. FSMEX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Putnam Global Health Care Fund (PHSTX) is 4.25%, while Fidelity Select Medical Technology and Devices Portfolio (FSMEX) has a volatility of 5.85%. This indicates that PHSTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSMEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PHSTX | FSMEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.25% | 5.85% | -1.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.95% | 12.32% | -2.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.72% | 21.03% | -4.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.21% | 20.75% | -6.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.79% | 20.59% | -4.80% |