PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JFNAX vs. JARTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JFNAX vs. JARTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A (JFNAX) and Janus Henderson Forty Fund (JARTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JFNAX achieves a 3.63% return, which is significantly higher than JARTX's 0.94% return. Over the past 10 years, JFNAX has underperformed JARTX with an annualized return of 11.77%, while JARTX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.24% annualized return.


JFNAX

1D
1.24%
1M
3.85%
YTD
3.63%
6M
2.62%
1Y
32.79%
3Y*
11.55%
5Y*
7.38%
10Y*
11.77%

JARTX

1D
-2.65%
1M
-2.72%
YTD
0.94%
6M
-0.12%
1Y
12.47%
3Y*
19.71%
5Y*
8.45%
10Y*
16.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JFNAX vs. JARTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JFNAX
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A
3.63%24.61%3.41%7.35%-2.86%6.59%25.42%28.98%4.00%22.35%
JARTX
Janus Henderson Forty Fund
0.94%17.88%27.76%39.50%-33.81%22.30%38.69%36.30%1.10%29.05%

Correlation

The correlation between JFNAX and JARTX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2009

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between JFNAX and JARTX has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JFNAX vs. JARTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JFNAX
JFNAX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
JFNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JFNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
JFNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
JFNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
JFNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

JARTX
JARTX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
JARTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JARTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
JARTX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
JARTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
JARTX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JFNAX vs. JARTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A (JFNAX) and Janus Henderson Forty Fund (JARTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JFNAXJARTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.15

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.59

0.78

+2.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.39

2.49

+8.90

JFNAX vs. JARTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JFNAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the JARTX Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JFNAX and JARTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JFNAX vs. JARTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JFNAX drawdown since its inception was -31.07%, smaller than the maximum JARTX drawdown of -56.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JFNAX and JARTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JFNAXJARTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.07%

-56.70%

+25.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.71%

-19.19%

+9.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.28%

-22.22%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.29%

-41.09%

+18.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.39%

-41.09%

+13.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-7.22%

+7.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.28%

-16.81%

+10.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

6.00%

-2.94%

Volatility

JFNAX vs. JARTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A (JFNAX) is 5.66%, while Janus Henderson Forty Fund (JARTX) has a volatility of 8.02%. This indicates that JFNAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JARTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JFNAXJARTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.66%

8.02%

-2.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.44%

14.98%

-3.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.27%

18.78%

-3.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.95%

22.21%

-6.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.36%

21.54%

-4.18%

JFNAX vs. JARTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JFNAX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than JARTX's 1.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

JFNAX vs. JARTX - Dividend Comparison

JFNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, less than JARTX's 13.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JARTX
Janus Henderson Forty Fund
13.53%13.65%11.51%9.10%0.06%10.26%8.38%7.05%8.95%14.50%6.57%15.93%
JFNAX
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A
4.40%4.56%5.74%4.28%0.08%9.90%7.82%6.18%13.55%1.03%0.97%8.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


JFNAX and JARTX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JARTX has higher volatility (8.02%) compared to JFNAX (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JFNAX dropped -31.07% vs JARTX's -56.70%.

JFNAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JFNAX and JARTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer