PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JFNAX vs. FPHAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JFNAX vs. FPHAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A (JFNAX) and Fidelity Select Pharmaceuticals Portfolio (FPHAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JFNAX achieves a -3.68% return, which is significantly lower than FPHAX's 6.98% return. Over the past 10 years, JFNAX has underperformed FPHAX with an annualized return of 10.23%, while FPHAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.40% annualized return.


JFNAX

1D
-2.63%
1M
-1.54%
YTD
-3.68%
6M
-2.10%
1Y
24.85%
3Y*
9.12%
5Y*
6.84%
10Y*
10.23%

FPHAX

1D
0.22%
1M
4.33%
YTD
6.98%
6M
7.84%
1Y
40.09%
3Y*
17.20%
5Y*
12.94%
10Y*
11.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JFNAX vs. FPHAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JFNAX
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A
-3.68%24.61%3.41%7.35%-2.86%6.59%25.42%28.98%4.00%22.35%
FPHAX
Fidelity Select Pharmaceuticals Portfolio
6.98%30.41%9.39%12.54%0.94%11.79%11.16%31.73%5.41%10.70%

Correlation

The correlation between JFNAX and FPHAX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2009

0.88

The correlation between JFNAX and FPHAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JFNAX vs. FPHAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JFNAX
JFNAX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
JFNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JFNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
JFNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
JFNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
JFNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

FPHAX
FPHAX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FPHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
FPHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JFNAX vs. FPHAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A (JFNAX) and Fidelity Select Pharmaceuticals Portfolio (FPHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JFNAXFPHAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.34

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

3.88

-1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.33

10.11

-1.79

JFNAX vs. FPHAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JFNAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the FPHAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JFNAX and FPHAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JFNAXFPHAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

1.99

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.72

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.64

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.54

+0.29

Drawdowns

JFNAX vs. FPHAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JFNAX drawdown since its inception was -31.07%, smaller than the maximum FPHAX drawdown of -38.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JFNAX and FPHAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JFNAXFPHAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.07%

-38.26%

+7.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.71%

-10.33%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.28%

-28.82%

+7.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.29%

-28.82%

+6.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.39%

-28.82%

+1.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.57%

-2.57%

-4.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.29%

-9.18%

+2.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

3.96%

-0.92%

Volatility

JFNAX vs. FPHAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A (JFNAX) is 4.70%, while Fidelity Select Pharmaceuticals Portfolio (FPHAX) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that JFNAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPHAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JFNAXFPHAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.70%

5.34%

-0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.96%

14.11%

-3.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.86%

20.14%

-5.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.85%

18.03%

-2.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.38%

17.86%

-0.48%

JFNAX vs. FPHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JFNAX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than FPHAX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

JFNAX vs. FPHAX - Dividend Comparison

JFNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, less than FPHAX's 5.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPHAX
Fidelity Select Pharmaceuticals Portfolio
5.20%5.68%1.90%8.08%5.18%11.09%8.85%8.33%1.65%1.62%1.07%12.63%
JFNAX
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A
4.73%4.56%5.74%4.28%0.08%9.90%7.82%6.18%13.55%1.03%0.97%8.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


JFNAX and FPHAX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FPHAX has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to JFNAX (4.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JFNAX dropped -31.07% vs FPHAX's -38.26%.

FPHAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JFNAX and FPHAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer