JFNAX vs. FBTTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A (JFNAX) and Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class M (FBTTX).
JFNAX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Dec 31, 1998. FBTTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 27, 2000.
Performance
JFNAX vs. FBTTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JFNAX vs. FBTTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JFNAX Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A | -2.87% | 24.61% | 3.41% | 7.35% | -2.86% | 6.59% | 25.42% | 28.98% | 4.00% | 22.35% |
FBTTX Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class M | 2.33% | 39.21% | 5.08% | 10.43% | -8.22% | -3.35% | 31.82% | 25.39% | -4.19% | 25.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JFNAX achieves a -2.87% return, which is significantly lower than FBTTX's 2.33% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JFNAX having a 11.06% annualized return and FBTTX not far ahead at 11.56%.
JFNAX
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- -3.20%
- YTD
- -2.87%
- 6M
- 12.71%
- 1Y
- 21.18%
- 3Y*
- 10.83%
- 5Y*
- 7.35%
- 10Y*
- 11.06%
FBTTX
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 1.16%
- YTD
- 2.33%
- 6M
- 16.05%
- 1Y
- 51.97%
- 3Y*
- 20.19%
- 5Y*
- 8.67%
- 10Y*
- 11.56%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JFNAX vs. FBTTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JFNAX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than FBTTX's 1.28% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JFNAX vs. FBTTX — Risk / Return Rank
JFNAX
FBTTX
JFNAX vs. FBTTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A (JFNAX) and Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class M (FBTTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JFNAX | FBTTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.28 | 2.17 | -0.88 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.81 | 2.79 | -0.98 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.36 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 3.67 | -1.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.77 | 14.06 | -8.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JFNAX | FBTTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 2.17 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.37 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.47 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.30 | +0.54 |
Correlation
The correlation between JFNAX and FBTTX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JFNAX vs. FBTTX - Dividend Comparison
JFNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, more than FBTTX's 1.50% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JFNAX Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A | 4.69% | 4.56% | 5.74% | 4.28% | 0.08% | 9.90% | 7.82% | 6.18% | 13.55% | 1.03% | 0.97% | 8.93% |
FBTTX Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class M | 1.50% | 1.53% | 6.41% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 21.60% | 8.79% | 7.10% | 2.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.42% |
Drawdowns
JFNAX vs. FBTTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JFNAX drawdown since its inception was -31.07%, smaller than the maximum FBTTX drawdown of -63.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JFNAX and FBTTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JFNAX | FBTTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.07% | -63.75% | +32.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.71% | -11.48% | +1.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.29% | -36.64% | +14.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.39% | -39.04% | +11.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.78% | -2.47% | -3.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.31% | -21.95% | +15.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.45% | 3.54% | -0.09% |
Volatility
JFNAX vs. FBTTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A (JFNAX) is 5.96%, while Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class M (FBTTX) has a volatility of 9.19%. This indicates that JFNAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBTTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JFNAX | FBTTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.96% | 9.19% | -3.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.52% | 16.97% | -6.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.86% | 25.89% | -8.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.70% | 23.31% | -7.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.41% | 24.58% | -7.17% |