JFNAX vs. FBTAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A (JFNAX) and Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class A (FBTAX).
JFNAX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Dec 31, 1998. FBTAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 27, 2000.
Performance
JFNAX vs. FBTAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JFNAX vs. FBTAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JFNAX Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A | -3.77% | 24.61% | 3.41% | 7.35% | -2.86% | 6.59% | 25.42% | 28.98% | 4.00% | 22.35% |
FBTAX Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class A | 2.24% | 39.54% | 5.37% | 10.70% | -7.95% | -3.10% | 32.17% | 25.74% | -3.86% | 25.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JFNAX achieves a -3.77% return, which is significantly lower than FBTAX's 2.24% return. Over the past 10 years, JFNAX has underperformed FBTAX with an annualized return of 10.96%, while FBTAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.86% annualized return.
JFNAX
- 1D
- 3.08%
- 1M
- -5.56%
- YTD
- -3.77%
- 6M
- 11.78%
- 1Y
- 21.47%
- 3Y*
- 10.49%
- 5Y*
- 7.15%
- 10Y*
- 10.96%
FBTAX
- 1D
- 5.08%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 2.24%
- 6M
- 15.54%
- 1Y
- 55.40%
- 3Y*
- 20.44%
- 5Y*
- 8.92%
- 10Y*
- 11.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JFNAX vs. FBTAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JFNAX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than FBTAX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JFNAX vs. FBTAX — Risk / Return Rank
JFNAX
FBTAX
JFNAX vs. FBTAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A (JFNAX) and Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class A (FBTAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JFNAX | FBTAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.06 | 1.94 | -0.88 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.52 | 2.53 | -1.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.33 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 3.16 | -1.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.89 | 12.63 | -7.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JFNAX | FBTAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 1.94 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.38 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.48 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.31 | +0.52 |
Correlation
The correlation between JFNAX and FBTAX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JFNAX vs. FBTAX - Dividend Comparison
JFNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, more than FBTAX's 1.42% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JFNAX Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A | 4.73% | 4.56% | 5.74% | 4.28% | 0.08% | 9.90% | 7.82% | 6.18% | 13.55% | 1.03% | 0.97% | 8.93% |
FBTAX Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class A | 1.42% | 1.45% | 6.00% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 20.12% | 8.37% | 6.77% | 2.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.36% |
Drawdowns
JFNAX vs. FBTAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JFNAX drawdown since its inception was -31.07%, smaller than the maximum FBTAX drawdown of -63.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JFNAX and FBTAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JFNAX | FBTAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.07% | -63.55% | +32.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.71% | -13.60% | +3.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.29% | -36.51% | +14.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.39% | -38.82% | +11.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.65% | -2.54% | -4.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.31% | -21.34% | +15.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.63% | 3.71% | -0.08% |
Volatility
JFNAX vs. FBTAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A (JFNAX) is 6.00%, while Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class A (FBTAX) has a volatility of 9.36%. This indicates that JFNAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBTAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JFNAX | FBTAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.00% | 9.36% | -3.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.64% | 17.00% | -6.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.86% | 26.00% | -8.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.70% | 23.32% | -7.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.41% | 24.59% | -7.18% |