JFLI vs. SLB
JFLI (JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF) is Global Allocation fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while SLB (Schlumberger Limited) is a stock. Over the past year, JFLI returned 18.61% vs 71.52% for SLB. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
JFLI vs. SLB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JFLI achieves a 7.84% return, which is significantly lower than SLB's 48.99% return.
JFLI
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 7.84%
- 6M
- 7.85%
- 1Y
- 18.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLB
- 1D
- 3.06%
- 1M
- 6.71%
- YTD
- 48.99%
- 6M
- 49.53%
- 1Y
- 71.52%
- 3Y*
- 8.69%
- 5Y*
- 12.03%
- 10Y*
- -0.41%
JFLI vs. SLB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JFLI JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF | 7.84% | 9.49% |
SLB Schlumberger Limited | 48.99% | -6.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between JFLI and SLB is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JFLI vs. SLB — Risk / Return Rank
JFLI
SLB
JFLI vs. SLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF (JFLI) and Schlumberger Limited (SLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JFLI | SLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.35 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | 5.03 | -2.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.38 | 12.70 | +0.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JFLI | SLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | 2.12 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.13 | 0.14 | +0.99 |
Drawdowns
JFLI vs. SLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JFLI drawdown since its inception was -12.87%, smaller than the maximum SLB drawdown of -87.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JFLI and SLB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JFLI | SLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.87% | -87.64% | +74.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.67% | -14.30% | +7.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -46.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -84.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.19% | -33.09% | +30.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.44% | -31.18% | +29.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.39% | 5.65% | -4.26% |
Volatility
JFLI vs. SLB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF (JFLI) is 3.23%, while Schlumberger Limited (SLB) has a volatility of 9.86%. This indicates that JFLI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JFLI | SLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.23% | 9.86% | -6.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.35% | 25.96% | -18.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.74% | 33.98% | -25.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.03% | 37.66% | -25.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.03% | 40.43% | -28.40% |
Dividends
JFLI vs. SLB - Dividend Comparison
JFLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.33%, more than SLB's 2.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JFLI JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF | 7.33% | 6.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLB Schlumberger Limited | 2.05% | 2.97% | 2.87% | 1.92% | 1.22% | 2.09% | 4.01% | 4.98% | 5.54% | 2.97% | 2.38% | 2.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JFLI and SLB have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLB has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to JFLI (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JFLI dropped -12.87% vs SLB's -87.64%.
JFLI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JFLI and SLB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer