JETU vs. NIOG
JETU (MAX Airlines 3X Leveraged ETN) and NIOG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - JETU tracks the Prime Airlines Index - Benchmark TR Net while NIOG tracks the NIO Inc. (NIO). Both are passively managed. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JETU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NIOG.
Performance
JETU vs. NIOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JETU achieves a 18.81% return, which is significantly higher than NIOG's -22.74% return.
JETU
- 1D
- -1.85%
- 1M
- 5.33%
- 6M
- 3.35%
- YTD
- 18.81%
- 1Y
- 42.73%
- 3Y*
- 8.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NIOG
- 1D
- 3.78%
- 1M
- -8.94%
- 6M
- -8.40%
- YTD
- -22.74%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JETU vs. NIOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JETU MAX Airlines 3X Leveraged ETN | 18.81% | 2.57% |
NIOG Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF | -22.74% | 3.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between JETU and NIOG is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JETU vs. NIOG — Risk / Return Rank
JETU
NIOG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
JETU vs. NIOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MAX Airlines 3X Leveraged ETN (JETU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF (NIOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JETU | NIOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.87 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.12 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JETU vs. NIOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JETU drawdown since its inception was -68.64%, which is greater than NIOG's maximum drawdown of -56.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JETU and NIOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JETU | NIOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.64% | -56.27% | -12.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.40% | -51.59% | +35.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.89% | -25.36% | -3.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.20% | — | — |
Volatility
JETU vs. NIOG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JETU | NIOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.17% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.17% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.17% | 113.02% | -37.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.37% | 113.02% | -41.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.37% | 113.02% | -41.65% |
JETU vs. NIOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
JETU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NIOG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
JETU vs. NIOG - Dividend Comparison
Neither JETU nor NIOG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
JETU and NIOG have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NIOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NIOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for JETU.
JETU and NIOG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
JETU tracks Prime Airlines Index - Benchmark TR Net, while NIOG tracks NIO Inc. (NIO). They also come from different issuers: Max and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for JETU and 0.75% for NIOG.
Find the right allocation for JETU and NIOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer