JETU vs. NIOG
JETU (MAX Airlines 3X Leveraged ETN) and NIOG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - JETU tracks the Prime Airlines Index - Benchmark TR Net while NIOG tracks the NIO Inc. (NIO). Both are passively managed. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JETU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NIOG.
Performance
JETU vs. NIOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JETU achieves a 32.26% return, which is significantly higher than NIOG's -24.92% return.
JETU
- 1D
- 8.15%
- 1M
- 37.10%
- YTD
- 32.26%
- 6M
- 25.12%
- 1Y
- 97.92%
- 3Y*
- 17.57%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NIOG
- 1D
- -6.74%
- 1M
- -14.17%
- YTD
- -24.92%
- 6M
- -20.30%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JETU vs. NIOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JETU MAX Airlines 3X Leveraged ETN | 32.26% | 2.57% |
NIOG Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF | -24.92% | 3.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between JETU and NIOG is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JETU vs. NIOG — Risk / Return Rank
JETU
NIOG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
JETU vs. NIOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MAX Airlines 3X Leveraged ETN (JETU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF (NIOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JETU | NIOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.88 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JETU vs. NIOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JETU drawdown since its inception was -68.64%, which is greater than NIOG's maximum drawdown of -52.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JETU and NIOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JETU | NIOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.64% | -52.95% | -15.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.27% | -52.95% | +47.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.29% | -22.49% | -6.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.12% | — | — |
Volatility
JETU vs. NIOG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JETU | NIOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.98% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 61.95% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.19% | 115.64% | -39.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.63% | 115.64% | -44.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.63% | 115.64% | -44.01% |
JETU vs. NIOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
JETU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NIOG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
JETU vs. NIOG - Dividend Comparison
Neither JETU nor NIOG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
JETU and NIOG have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NIOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NIOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for JETU.
JETU and NIOG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
JETU tracks Prime Airlines Index - Benchmark TR Net, while NIOG tracks NIO Inc. (NIO). They also come from different issuers: Max and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for JETU and 0.75% for NIOG.
Find the right allocation for JETU and NIOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer