JETS vs. EVX
JETS (U.S. Global Jets ETF) and EVX (VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds - JETS tracks the U.S. Global Jets Index while EVX tracks the NYSE Arca Environmental Services Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JETS returned 4.71%/yr vs 12.19%/yr for EVX. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JETS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for EVX.
Performance
JETS vs. EVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JETS achieves a 11.08% return, which is significantly higher than EVX's 4.15% return. Over the past 10 years, JETS has underperformed EVX with an annualized return of 4.71%, while EVX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.19% annualized return.
JETS
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 14.93%
- YTD
- 11.08%
- 6M
- 9.61%
- 1Y
- 42.95%
- 3Y*
- 15.86%
- 5Y*
- 4.58%
- 10Y*
- 4.71%
EVX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 1.74%
- YTD
- 4.15%
- 6M
- 2.75%
- 1Y
- 4.73%
- 3Y*
- 9.73%
- 5Y*
- 7.59%
- 10Y*
- 12.19%
JETS vs. EVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JETS U.S. Global Jets ETF | 11.08% | 11.64% | 33.21% | 11.42% | -19.01% | -5.13% | -28.93% | 14.38% | -14.30% | 18.66% |
EVX VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF | 4.15% | 11.72% | 12.99% | 12.97% | -10.58% | 27.47% | 13.28% | 28.41% | -3.82% | 16.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between JETS and EVX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2015 | 0.48 |
The correlation between JETS and EVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
JETS vs. EVX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JETS
EVX
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
JETS
EVX
Consumer Cyclical
JETS
EVX
-
Technology
JETS
EVX
-
Basic Materials
JETS
-
EVX
Communication Services
JETS
-
EVX
-
Consumer Defensive
JETS
-
EVX
Energy
JETS
-
EVX
Financial Services
JETS
-
EVX
-
Healthcare
JETS
-
EVX
-
Real Estate
JETS
-
EVX
-
Utilities
JETS
-
EVX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JETS vs. EVX — Risk / Return Rank
JETS
EVX
JETS vs. EVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) and VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF (EVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JETS | EVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.07 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 0.44 | +1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.55 | 0.99 | +3.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JETS vs. EVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JETS drawdown since its inception was -64.92%, which is greater than EVX's maximum drawdown of -55.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JETS and EVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JETS | EVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.92% | -55.91% | -9.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.13% | -10.85% | -13.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.21% | -19.33% | -15.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.76% | -21.45% | -19.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.92% | -41.01% | -23.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.46% | -5.91% | -1.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.12% | -8.75% | -16.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.46% | 4.81% | +4.65% |
Volatility
JETS vs. EVX - Volatility Comparison
U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) has a higher volatility of 11.08% compared to VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF (EVX) at 3.93%. This indicates that JETS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JETS | EVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.08% | 3.93% | +7.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.68% | 10.06% | +15.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.15% | 13.73% | +19.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.54% | 17.60% | +14.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.23% | 20.25% | +13.98% |
JETS vs. EVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JETS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than EVX's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
JETS vs. EVX - Dividend Comparison
JETS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, more than EVX's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVX VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF | 0.18% | 0.19% | 0.46% | 0.95% | 0.41% | 0.24% | 0.32% | 0.38% | 0.38% | 0.89% | 0.70% | 1.16% |
JETS U.S. Global Jets ETF | 0.75% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 0.04% | 1.24% | 0.09% | 1.57% | 0.58% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JETS and EVX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JETS has higher volatility (11.08%) compared to EVX (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JETS dropped -64.92% vs EVX's -55.91%.
On 10-year performance, EVX leads with 12.19% vs 4.71% for JETS. On fees, EVX is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, EVX has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EVX has performed better with a 12.19% return vs 4.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EVX is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for JETS.
JETS has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.18% for EVX.
JETS tracks U.S. Global Jets Index, while EVX tracks NYSE Arca Environmental Services Index. They also come from different issuers: US Global and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for JETS and 0.55% for EVX.
JETS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JETS and EVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer