JETD vs. MSTZ
JETD (MAX Airlines -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. JETD is passively managed, while MSTZ is actively managed. Over the past year, JETD returned -77.54% vs 279.21% for MSTZ. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JETD charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.
Performance
JETD vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JETD achieves a -54.04% return, which is significantly lower than MSTZ's 1.05% return.
JETD
- 1D
- -4.72%
- 1M
- -31.48%
- YTD
- -54.04%
- 6M
- -51.71%
- 1Y
- -77.54%
- 3Y*
- -55.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTZ
- 1D
- 19.27%
- 1M
- 186.45%
- YTD
- 1.05%
- 6M
- 9.89%
- 1Y
- 279.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JETD vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
JETD MAX Airlines -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -54.04% | -59.89% | -37.12% |
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | 1.05% | -38.95% | -94.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between JETD and MSTZ is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JETD vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank
JETD
MSTZ
JETD vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MAX Airlines -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (JETD) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JETD | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.32 | -0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.01 | 3.31 | -4.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.68 | 6.57 | -8.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JETD vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JETD drawdown since its inception was -95.22%, roughly equal to the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JETD and MSTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JETD | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.22% | -99.38% | +4.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -76.78% | -84.89% | +8.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -95.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.22% | -96.56% | +1.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -61.93% | -94.46% | +32.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 47.65% | 42.70% | +4.95% |
Volatility
JETD vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MAX Airlines -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (JETD) is 31.75%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 46.08%. This indicates that JETD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JETD | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.75% | 46.08% | -14.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 64.66% | 129.73% | -65.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.92% | 145.84% | -69.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.61% | 170.65% | -99.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.61% | 170.65% | -99.04% |
JETD vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
JETD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
JETD vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither JETD nor MSTZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
JETD and MSTZ have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTZ has higher volatility (46.08%) compared to JETD (31.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JETD dropped -95.22% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.
On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 279.21% vs -77.54% for JETD. On fees, JETD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, JETD has been the lower-risk option at 31.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 279.21% return vs -77.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JETD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.
JETD and MSTZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Max and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for JETD and 1.05% for MSTZ.
MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JETD and MSTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer