JEMA vs. EEMO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JEMA (JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and EEMO (Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JEMA is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while EEMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index. JEMA is actively managed, while EEMO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JEMA returned 7.20%/yr vs 7.19%/yr for EEMO. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JEMA charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for EEMO.

Performance

JEMA vs. EEMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JEMA) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JEMA achieves a 31.42% return, which is significantly lower than EEMO's 40.25% return.

JEMA

• 1D: -1.10%
• 1M: 9.00%
• YTD: 31.42%
• 6M: 33.11%
• 1Y: 63.06%
• 3Y*: 24.84%
• 5Y*: 7.20%
• 10Y*: —

EEMO

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: 18.59%
• YTD: 40.25%
• 6M: 41.33%
• 1Y: 57.41%
• 3Y*: 25.30%
• 5Y*: 7.19%
• 10Y*: 8.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JEMA vs. EEMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
JEMA JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF	31.42%	34.89%	5.68%	9.82%	-24.98%	-4.78%
EEMO Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF	40.25%	10.99%	9.88%	13.90%	-18.73%	-10.91%

Correlation

The correlation between JEMA and EEMO is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2021	0.82

The correlation between JEMA and EEMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

JEMA vs. EEMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JEMA	EEMO
Technology	41.1%	43.8%
Financial Services	21.2%	18.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	3.2%
Industrials	7.4%	11.5%
Communication Services	7.0%	1.5%
Energy	4.0%	2.5%
Basic Materials	3.5%	12.9%
Consumer Defensive	2.5%	1.2%
Healthcare	1.7%	3.0%
Utilities	1.4%	2.0%
Real Estate	0.6%	0.5%

Return for Risk

JEMA vs. EEMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JEMA

JEMA Risk / Return Rank: 88
JEMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
JEMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
JEMA Omega Ratio Rank: 89
JEMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
JEMA Martin Ratio Rank: 89

EEMO

EEMO Risk / Return Rank: 75
EEMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
EEMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
EEMO Omega Ratio Rank: 77
EEMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
EEMO Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JEMA vs. EEMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JEMA) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JEMA	EEMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.14	2.36	+0.78
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.92	3.28	+0.64
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.46	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.84	3.91	+0.92
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	19.80	15.67	+4.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JEMA vs. EEMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JEMA Sharpe Ratio is 3.14, which is higher than the EEMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JEMA and EEMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JEMA	EEMO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.14	2.36	+0.78
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	0.37	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.41	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.13	+0.27

Drawdowns

JEMA vs. EEMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JEMA drawdown since its inception was -39.50%, smaller than the maximum EEMO drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEMA and EEMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	JEMA	EEMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.50%	-48.47%	+8.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.11%	-14.75%	+1.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.11%	-26.06%	+7.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.45%	-34.03%	-5.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-46.57%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.10%	-1.32%	+0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.04%	-20.17%	+3.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.19%	3.67%	-0.48%

Volatility

JEMA vs. EEMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JEMA) is 8.36%, while Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) has a volatility of 14.32%. This indicates that JEMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JEMA	EEMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.36%	14.32%	-5.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.54%	22.10%	-4.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.20%	24.45%	-4.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.02%	19.33%	-0.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.90%	21.59%	-2.69%

JEMA vs. EEMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

JEMA has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMO's 0.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

JEMA vs. EEMO - Dividend Comparison

JEMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than EEMO's 1.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EEMO Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF	1.64%	2.31%	2.57%	3.65%	3.82%	1.51%	1.53%	2.13%	13.10%	5.13%	1.55%	2.92%
JEMA JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF	2.23%	2.93%	2.44%	2.95%	2.69%	1.54%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JEMA and EEMO in my portfolio?

JEMA and EEMO have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JEMA or EEMO?

EEMO has higher volatility (14.32%) compared to JEMA (8.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JEMA dropped -39.50% vs EEMO's -48.47%.

Which ETF is better, JEMA or EEMO?

On 5-year performance, JEMA leads with 7.20% vs 7.19% for EEMO. On fees, EEMO is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, JEMA has been the lower-risk option at 8.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JEMA or EEMO?

Over the 5-year period, JEMA has performed better with a 7.20% return vs 7.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JEMA or EEMO?

EEMO is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for JEMA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JEMA or EEMO?

JEMA has the higher dividend yield at 2.23%, compared with 1.64% for EEMO.

What is the main difference between JEMA and EEMO?

JEMA is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while EEMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JEMA and 0.31% for EEMO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JEMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.