JELCX vs. BLNDX
JELCX (John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Conservative Portfolio) and BLNDX (Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, JELCX returned 1.27%/yr vs 9.26%/yr for BLNDX. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JELCX charges 0.18%/yr vs 1.27%/yr for BLNDX.
Performance
JELCX vs. BLNDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JELCX achieves a 3.35% return, which is significantly lower than BLNDX's 12.91% return.
JELCX
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 3.35%
- 6M
- 3.26%
- 1Y
- 9.88%
- 3Y*
- 6.04%
- 5Y*
- 1.27%
- 10Y*
- 2.13%
BLNDX
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -3.47%
- YTD
- 12.91%
- 6M
- 12.69%
- 1Y
- 30.93%
- 3Y*
- 10.21%
- 5Y*
- 9.26%
- 10Y*
- —
JELCX vs. BLNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JELCX John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Conservative Portfolio | 3.35% | 8.84% | 3.59% | 5.49% | -14.80% | 3.47% | 3.39% | -0.09% |
BLNDX Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional | 12.91% | 4.12% | 13.11% | 5.79% | 3.71% | 20.16% | 16.30% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between JELCX and BLNDX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2019 | 0.24 |
The correlation between JELCX and BLNDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (5 years) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JELCX vs. BLNDX — Risk / Return Rank
JELCX
BLNDX
JELCX vs. BLNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Conservative Portfolio (JELCX) and Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JELCX | BLNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.42 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | 5.89 | -3.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.31 | 18.90 | -7.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JELCX vs. BLNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JELCX drawdown since its inception was -33.80%, which is greater than BLNDX's maximum drawdown of -17.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JELCX and BLNDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JELCX | BLNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.80% | -17.69% | -16.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.05% | -5.19% | +1.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.02% | -17.69% | +10.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.46% | -17.69% | -0.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.73% | +4.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.45% | -3.19% | -7.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.94% | 1.61% | -0.67% |
Volatility
JELCX vs. BLNDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Conservative Portfolio (JELCX) is 1.87%, while Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX) has a volatility of 3.59%. This indicates that JELCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JELCX | BLNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.87% | 3.59% | -1.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.01% | 9.91% | -5.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.24% | 12.74% | -7.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.34% | 11.71% | -5.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.57% | 11.77% | -6.20% |
JELCX vs. BLNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JELCX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than BLNDX's 1.27% expense ratio.
Dividends
JELCX vs. BLNDX - Dividend Comparison
JELCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than BLNDX's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLNDX Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional | 0.65% | 0.73% | 5.74% | 3.71% | 2.67% | 6.11% | 1.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JELCX John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Conservative Portfolio | 3.68% | 3.81% | 3.39% | 5.18% | 3.05% | 3.12% | 4.47% | 2.39% | 5.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JELCX and BLNDX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLNDX has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to JELCX (1.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JELCX dropped -33.80% vs BLNDX's -17.69%.
BLNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JELCX and BLNDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer