JDVL vs. FDL
JDVL (John Hancock Disciplined Value Select ETF) and FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. JDVL is actively managed, while FDL is passively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JDVL charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FDL.
Performance
JDVL vs. FDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JDVL achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 14.42% return.
JDVL
- 1D
- -3.31%
- 1M
- 1.71%
- YTD
- 12.39%
- 6M
- 13.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDL
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- 14.42%
- 6M
- 15.89%
- 1Y
- 25.91%
- 3Y*
- 19.36%
- 5Y*
- 12.73%
- 10Y*
- 11.25%
JDVL vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JDVL John Hancock Disciplined Value Select ETF | 12.39% | 10.04% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 14.42% | 7.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between JDVL and FDL is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2025 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JDVL vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank
JDVL
FDL
JDVL vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Disciplined Value Select ETF (JDVL) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JDVL | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.09 | 0.45 | +1.64 |
Drawdowns
JDVL vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JDVL drawdown since its inception was -9.17%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JDVL and FDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JDVL | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.17% | -65.93% | +56.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.31% | -1.24% | -2.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.30% | -9.65% | +8.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.75% | — |
Volatility
JDVL vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JDVL | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.84% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.78% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.97% | 11.27% | +2.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.97% | 14.31% | -0.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.97% | 17.11% | -3.14% |
JDVL vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
JDVL has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
JDVL vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison
JDVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than FDL's 3.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 3.64% | 4.04% | 4.96% | 4.58% | 3.58% | 4.59% | 4.48% | 3.75% | 3.97% | 3.18% | 2.93% | 3.65% |
JDVL John Hancock Disciplined Value Select ETF | 1.52% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JDVL and FDL have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FDL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for JDVL.
FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.64%, compared with 1.52% for JDVL.
They also come from different issuers: John Hancock and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for JDVL and 0.45% for FDL.
Find the right allocation for JDVL and FDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer