PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JDVI vs. JHCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JDVI vs. JHCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Disciplined Value International Select ETF (JDVI) and John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JDVI achieves a 12.15% return, which is significantly higher than JHCB's 0.37% return.


JDVI

1D
-0.89%
1M
5.02%
YTD
12.15%
6M
15.78%
1Y
31.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JHCB

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.63%
YTD
0.37%
6M
-0.08%
1Y
5.68%
3Y*
5.68%
5Y*
0.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JDVI vs. JHCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
JDVI
John Hancock Disciplined Value International Select ETF
12.15%42.97%0.68%2.25%
JHCB
John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF
0.37%8.02%2.75%0.43%

Correlation

The correlation between JDVI and JHCB is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2023

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JDVI vs. JHCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JDVI
JDVI Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
JDVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JDVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
JDVI Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
JDVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
JDVI Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

JHCB
JHCB Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
JHCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHCB Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
JHCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHCB Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JDVI vs. JHCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Disciplined Value International Select ETF (JDVI) and John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JDVIJHCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.23

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

1.81

+0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.67

5.94

+3.73

JDVI vs. JHCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JDVI Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the JHCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JDVI and JHCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JDVIJHCBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

1.30

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.39

0.15

+1.24

Drawdowns

JDVI vs. JHCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JDVI drawdown since its inception was -14.97%, smaller than the maximum JHCB drawdown of -22.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JDVI and JHCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JDVIJHCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.97%

-22.61%

+7.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.50%

-3.16%

-9.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.89%

-1.04%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.79%

-8.21%

+5.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

0.96%

+2.34%

Volatility

JDVI vs. JHCB - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Disciplined Value International Select ETF (JDVI) has a higher volatility of 5.86% compared to John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB) at 1.42%. This indicates that JDVI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JDVIJHCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.86%

1.42%

+4.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.97%

3.25%

+10.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.37%

4.41%

+11.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.42%

6.95%

+9.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.42%

6.88%

+9.54%

JDVI vs. JHCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

JDVI has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than JHCB's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

JDVI vs. JHCB - Dividend Comparison

JDVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, less than JHCB's 4.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
JDVI
John Hancock Disciplined Value International Select ETF
2.16%2.43%1.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JHCB
John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF
4.96%4.92%5.02%4.35%3.86%2.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


JDVI and JHCB have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JDVI has higher volatility (5.86%) compared to JHCB (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JDVI dropped -14.97% vs JHCB's -22.61%.

On 1-year performance, JDVI leads with 31.81% vs 5.68% for JHCB. On fees, JHCB is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, JHCB has been the lower-risk option at 1.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JDVI has performed better with a 31.81% return vs 5.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JHCB is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for JDVI.

JHCB has the higher dividend yield at 4.96%, compared with 2.16% for JDVI.

JDVI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while JHCB is Corporate Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for JDVI and 0.29% for JHCB.

JDVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JDVI and JHCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer