JDST vs. GDXD
JDST (Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bear 2X Shares) and GDXD (MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) are both exchange-traded funds - JDST is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index (-300%), while GDXD is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JDST returned -52.35%/yr vs -72.96%/yr for GDXD. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. JDST charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for GDXD.
Performance
JDST vs. GDXD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JDST achieves a -15.75% return, which is significantly higher than GDXD's -37.37% return.
JDST
- 1D
- 7.16%
- 1M
- 12.73%
- 6M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- -15.75%
- 1Y
- -75.99%
- 3Y*
- -65.43%
- 5Y*
- -52.35%
- 10Y*
- -60.31%
GDXD
- 1D
- 8.77%
- 1M
- 16.42%
- 6M
- -11.19%
- YTD
- -37.37%
- 1Y
- -91.03%
- 3Y*
- -82.31%
- 5Y*
- -72.96%
- 10Y*
- —
JDST vs. GDXD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JDST Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bear 2X Shares | -15.75% | -91.10% | -40.98% | -28.29% | -26.25% | 10.97% | -12.08% |
GDXD MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | -37.37% | -97.53% | -57.78% | -52.35% | -52.56% | -19.71% | -13.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between JDST and GDXD is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2020 | 0.98 |
The correlation between JDST and GDXD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JDST vs. GDXD — Risk / Return Rank
JDST
GDXD
JDST vs. GDXD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bear 2X Shares (JDST) and MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (GDXD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JDST | GDXD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 0.85 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | -0.95 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.08 | -1.12 | +0.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JDST vs. GDXD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JDST drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum GDXD drawdown of -99.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JDST and GDXD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JDST | GDXD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -99.96% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -88.98% | -96.19% | +7.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.58% | -99.86% | +1.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.28% | -99.96% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -100.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -99.91% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -95.33% | -72.32% | -23.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 70.33% | 80.98% | -10.65% |
Volatility
JDST vs. GDXD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bear 2X Shares (JDST) is 34.78%, while MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (GDXD) has a volatility of 47.16%. This indicates that JDST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JDST | GDXD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.78% | 47.16% | -12.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 86.06% | 117.86% | -31.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 105.38% | 144.94% | -39.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.47% | 112.08% | -29.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 104.51% | 110.75% | -6.24% |
JDST vs. GDXD - Expense Ratio Comparison
JDST has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than GDXD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
JDST vs. GDXD - Dividend Comparison
JDST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.76%, while GDXD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXD MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JDST Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bear 2X Shares | 5.76% | 15.08% | 6.50% | 4.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.75% | 3.16% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, JDST and GDXD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GDXD has higher volatility (47.16%) compared to JDST (34.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JDST dropped -100.00% vs GDXD's -99.96%.
On 5-year performance, JDST leads with -52.35% vs -72.96% for GDXD. On fees, GDXD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, JDST has been the lower-risk option at 34.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JDST has performed better with a -52.35% return vs -72.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GDXD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for JDST.
JDST has the higher dividend yield at 5.76%, compared with 0.00% for GDXD.
JDST is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while GDXD is Inverse Equities. JDST tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index (-300%), while GDXD tracks S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross (-300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and BMO. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for JDST and 0.95% for GDXD.
GDXD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.63 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JDST and GDXD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer