PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JDOC vs. XLVI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JDOC vs. XLVI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Jpmorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF (JDOC) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLVI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JDOC achieves a -4.49% return, which is significantly lower than XLVI's -0.67% return.


JDOC

1D
0.50%
1M
0.16%
YTD
-4.49%
6M
-4.39%
1Y
12.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XLVI

1D
0.67%
1M
2.30%
YTD
-0.67%
6M
0.76%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JDOC vs. XLVI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JDOC and XLVI is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025

0.89

JDOC vs. XLVI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JDOC
XLVI

Healthcare

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

100.6%

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

JDOC
100.0%
XLVI

-

Basic Materials

JDOC

-

XLVI

-

Communication Services

JDOC

-

XLVI

-

Consumer Cyclical

JDOC

-

XLVI

-

Consumer Defensive

JDOC

-

XLVI

-

Energy

JDOC

-

XLVI

-

Financial Services

JDOC

-

XLVI
100.6%

Industrials

JDOC

-

XLVI

-

Real Estate

JDOC

-

XLVI

-

Technology

JDOC

-

XLVI

-

Utilities

JDOC

-

XLVI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JDOC vs. XLVI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JDOC
JDOC Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
JDOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JDOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
JDOC Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
JDOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
JDOC Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

XLVI
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JDOC vs. XLVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jpmorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF (JDOC) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JDOCXLVIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.34

JDOC vs. XLVI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JDOCXLVIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

1.33

-0.79

Drawdowns

JDOC vs. XLVI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JDOC drawdown since its inception was -20.87%, which is greater than XLVI's maximum drawdown of -8.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JDOC and XLVI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JDOCXLVIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.87%

-8.14%

-12.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.47%

-4.02%

-3.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.98%

-1.95%

-5.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.71%

Volatility

JDOC vs. XLVI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JDOCXLVIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.08%

10.94%

+3.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.32%

10.94%

+3.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.32%

10.94%

+3.38%

JDOC vs. XLVI - Expense Ratio Comparison

JDOC has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XLVI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

JDOC vs. XLVI - Dividend Comparison

JDOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than XLVI's 11.53% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
JDOC
Jpmorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF
0.93%0.89%5.57%0.15%
XLVI
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
11.53%5.73%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JDOC and XLVI have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLVI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLVI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for JDOC.

XLVI has the higher dividend yield at 11.53%, compared with 0.93% for JDOC.

JDOC is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while XLVI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for JDOC and 0.35% for XLVI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JDOC and XLVI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer