PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JDIV vs. BDVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JDIV vs. BDVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Dividend Leaders ETF (JDIV) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JDIV achieves a 6.35% return, which is significantly higher than BDVL's 5.11% return.


JDIV

1D
0.37%
1M
1.95%
YTD
6.35%
6M
6.29%
1Y
15.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BDVL

1D
0.38%
1M
0.49%
YTD
5.11%
6M
5.65%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JDIV vs. BDVL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JDIV and BDVL is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025

0.86

JDIV vs. BDVL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JDIV
BDVL

Technology

23.1%
23.0%

Financial Services

15.9%
13.9%

Healthcare

10.2%
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.8%
8.5%

Communication Services

6.7%
10.7%

Industrials

6.4%
15.4%

Energy

4.5%
2.8%

Utilities

3.4%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
6.3%

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.6%

Real Estate

1.5%
1.0%

Technology

JDIV
23.1%
BDVL
23.0%

Financial Services

JDIV
15.9%
BDVL
13.9%

Healthcare

JDIV
10.2%
BDVL
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

JDIV
7.8%
BDVL
8.5%

Communication Services

JDIV
6.7%
BDVL
10.7%

Industrials

JDIV
6.4%
BDVL
15.4%

Energy

JDIV
4.5%
BDVL
2.8%

Utilities

JDIV
3.4%
BDVL
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

JDIV
2.1%
BDVL
6.3%

Basic Materials

JDIV
1.8%
BDVL
2.6%

Real Estate

JDIV
1.5%
BDVL
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JDIV vs. BDVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JDIV
JDIV Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
JDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
JDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
JDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
JDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

BDVL
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JDIV vs. BDVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Dividend Leaders ETF (JDIV) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JDIVBDVLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.65

JDIV vs. BDVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JDIVBDVLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

1.07

-0.26

Drawdowns

JDIV vs. BDVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JDIV drawdown since its inception was -13.34%, which is greater than BDVL's maximum drawdown of -7.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JDIV and BDVL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JDIVBDVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.34%

-7.71%

-5.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-0.57%

+0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.01%

-1.19%

-0.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

Volatility

JDIV vs. BDVL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JDIVBDVLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.69%

9.47%

+2.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.08%

9.47%

+4.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.08%

9.47%

+4.61%

JDIV vs. BDVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

JDIV has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than BDVL's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

JDIV vs. BDVL - Dividend Comparison

JDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, less than BDVL's 2.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
BDVL
iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF
2.65%2.79%0.00%
JDIV
JPMorgan Dividend Leaders ETF
2.06%2.15%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


JDIV and BDVL have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BDVL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BDVL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for JDIV.

BDVL has the higher dividend yield at 2.65%, compared with 2.06% for JDIV.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for JDIV and 0.40% for BDVL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JDIV and BDVL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer