JDIV vs. NVDA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

JDIV (JPMorgan Dividend Leaders ETF) is Global Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock. Over the past year, JDIV returned 12.26% vs 38.94% for NVDA. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

JDIV vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Dividend Leaders ETF (JDIV) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JDIV achieves a 3.84% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 7.39% return.

JDIV

• 1D: -2.28%
• 1M: -0.99%
• YTD: 3.84%
• 6M: 3.70%
• 1Y: 12.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NVDA

• 1D: -4.13%
• 1M: -6.99%
• YTD: 7.39%
• 6M: 5.85%
• 1Y: 38.94%
• 3Y*: 68.08%
• 5Y*: 59.90%
• 10Y*: 67.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JDIV vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
JDIV JPMorgan Dividend Leaders ETF	3.84%	18.98%	-5.07%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	7.39%	38.92%	8.74%

Correlation

The correlation between JDIV and NVDA is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2024	0.44

Return for Risk

JDIV vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JDIV

JDIV Risk / Return Rank: 30
JDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
JDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
JDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 29
JDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
JDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 36

NVDA

NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 72
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 66
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JDIV vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Dividend Leaders ETF (JDIV) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JDIV	NVDA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.00	1.10	-0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.45	1.65	-0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.20	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.33	1.94	-0.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.20	4.51	+0.69

JDIV vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is comparable to the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JDIV and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JDIV vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JDIV drawdown since its inception was -13.34%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JDIV and NVDA.

Drawdown Indicators

	JDIV	NVDA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.34%	-89.72%	+76.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.28%	-20.21%	+10.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-36.88%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-66.34%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-66.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.64%	-15.04%	+12.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.99%	-36.16%	+34.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.36%	8.66%	-6.30%

Volatility

JDIV vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Dividend Leaders ETF (JDIV) is 4.76%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 13.29%. This indicates that JDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JDIV	NVDA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.76%	13.29%	-8.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.28%	26.92%	-16.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.35%	35.50%	-23.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.28%	51.84%	-37.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.28%	49.87%	-35.59%

Dividends

JDIV vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

JDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, more than NVDA's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JDIV JPMorgan Dividend Leaders ETF	2.11%	2.15%	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	0.14%	0.02%	0.03%	0.03%	0.11%	0.05%	0.12%	0.27%	0.46%	0.29%	0.45%	1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JDIV and NVDA in my portfolio?

JDIV and NVDA have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JDIV or NVDA?

NVDA has higher volatility (13.29%) compared to JDIV (4.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JDIV dropped -13.34% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.