PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JDIUX vs. VOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JDIUX vs. VOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Disciplined Value International Fund (JDIUX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JDIUX achieves a 12.18% return, which is significantly higher than VOT's 8.39% return. Over the past 10 years, JDIUX has underperformed VOT with an annualized return of 9.43%, while VOT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.18% annualized return.


JDIUX

1D
0.11%
1M
3.83%
YTD
12.18%
6M
14.89%
1Y
29.72%
3Y*
19.61%
5Y*
11.79%
10Y*
9.43%

VOT

1D
-0.83%
1M
5.62%
YTD
8.39%
6M
6.44%
1Y
11.36%
3Y*
16.24%
5Y*
6.88%
10Y*
12.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JDIUX vs. VOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JDIUX
John Hancock Disciplined Value International Fund
12.18%40.46%-0.24%19.42%-4.89%12.99%4.84%15.58%-18.60%23.99%
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
8.39%10.72%16.38%23.10%-28.87%20.50%34.50%33.76%-5.56%21.80%

Correlation

The correlation between JDIUX and VOT is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2014

0.69

The correlation between JDIUX and VOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JDIUX vs. VOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JDIUX
JDIUX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
JDIUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JDIUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
JDIUX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
JDIUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
JDIUX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

VOT
VOT Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
VOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOT Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
VOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOT Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JDIUX vs. VOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Disciplined Value International Fund (JDIUX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JDIUXVOTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.06

0.72

+1.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.81

1.10

+1.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.13

+0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

0.72

+1.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.16

2.14

+7.01

JDIUX vs. VOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JDIUX Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the VOT Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JDIUX and VOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JDIUXVOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

0.72

+1.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.32

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.58

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.45

+0.01

Drawdowns

JDIUX vs. VOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JDIUX drawdown since its inception was -43.98%, smaller than the maximum VOT drawdown of -60.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JDIUX and VOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JDIUXVOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.98%

-60.16%

+16.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.13%

-15.96%

+3.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.09%

-21.77%

+7.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.16%

-37.19%

+11.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.98%

-37.19%

-6.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-0.83%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.11%

-9.96%

+1.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

5.32%

-2.13%

Volatility

JDIUX vs. VOT - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Disciplined Value International Fund (JDIUX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) have volatilities of 4.17% and 4.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JDIUXVOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.17%

4.37%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.76%

12.36%

-0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.24%

15.81%

-1.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.42%

21.36%

-3.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.42%

20.99%

-3.57%

JDIUX vs. VOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

JDIUX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than VOT's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

JDIUX vs. VOT - Dividend Comparison

JDIUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.98%, more than VOT's 0.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JDIUX
John Hancock Disciplined Value International Fund
7.98%8.95%11.97%7.25%2.56%3.45%1.52%2.51%4.68%1.65%1.60%1.35%
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.61%0.64%0.67%0.71%0.78%0.34%0.56%0.78%0.84%0.72%0.81%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


JDIUX and VOT have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOT has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to JDIUX (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JDIUX dropped -43.98% vs VOT's -60.16%.

JDIUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JDIUX and VOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer