JCHI vs. CN
JCHI (JPMorgan Active China ETF) and CN (Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF) are both China Equities funds. JCHI is actively managed, while CN is passively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JCHI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CN.
Performance
JCHI vs. CN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
JCHI
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- YTD
- 0.50%
- 6M
- -0.36%
- 1Y
- 16.23%
- 3Y*
- 8.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CN
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JCHI vs. CN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JCHI JPMorgan Active China ETF | 0.50% | 27.66% | 13.77% | -17.06% |
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | -3.10% | -12.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between JCHI and CN is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2023 | 0.53 |
The correlation between JCHI and CN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
JCHI vs. CN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JCHI
CN
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
JCHI
CN
Financial Services
JCHI
CN
Technology
JCHI
CN
Communication Services
JCHI
CN
Industrials
JCHI
CN
Basic Materials
JCHI
CN
Healthcare
JCHI
CN
Consumer Defensive
JCHI
CN
Energy
JCHI
CN
Real Estate
JCHI
-
CN
Utilities
JCHI
-
CN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JCHI vs. CN — Risk / Return Rank
JCHI
CN
JCHI vs. CN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JCHI | CN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.74 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JCHI | CN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | — | — |
Drawdowns
JCHI vs. CN - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JCHI | CN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.41% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.33% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.93% | — | — |
Volatility
JCHI vs. CN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JCHI | CN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.28% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.32% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.59% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.86% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.86% | — | — |
JCHI vs. CN - Expense Ratio Comparison
JCHI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CN's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
JCHI vs. CN - Dividend Comparison
JCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, while CN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.04% | 1.80% | 2.00% | 0.78% | 4.18% | 2.09% | 0.81% | 11.41% | 14.00% |
JCHI JPMorgan Active China ETF | 1.80% | 1.81% | 2.12% | 2.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JCHI and CN have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for JCHI.
JCHI has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 0.00% for CN.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for JCHI and 0.50% for CN.
Find the right allocation for JCHI and CN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer