PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JBSSX vs. FFFCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JBSSX vs. FFFCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2025 Fund (JBSSX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JBSSX achieves a 5.98% return, which is significantly higher than FFFCX's 5.33% return. Over the past 10 years, JBSSX has outperformed FFFCX with an annualized return of 7.20%, while FFFCX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.84% annualized return.


JBSSX

1D
0.19%
1M
2.45%
YTD
5.98%
6M
6.21%
1Y
15.62%
3Y*
11.66%
5Y*
5.19%
10Y*
7.20%

FFFCX

1D
0.26%
1M
1.88%
YTD
5.33%
6M
5.67%
1Y
12.68%
3Y*
9.08%
5Y*
3.70%
10Y*
5.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JBSSX vs. FFFCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JBSSX
JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2025 Fund
5.98%13.25%5.46%16.55%-15.45%8.82%11.06%18.45%-6.00%15.29%
FFFCX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund
5.33%11.39%5.26%9.82%-13.21%5.64%11.09%14.34%-3.74%12.48%

Correlation

The correlation between JBSSX and FFFCX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.94

The correlation between JBSSX and FFFCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JBSSX vs. FFFCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JBSSX
JBSSX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
JBSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JBSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
JBSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
JBSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
JBSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

FFFCX
FFFCX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FFFCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFFCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFFCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FFFCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFFCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JBSSX vs. FFFCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2025 Fund (JBSSX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JBSSXFFFCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.53

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

3.20

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.65

13.95

-0.30

JBSSX vs. FFFCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JBSSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the FFFCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JBSSX and FFFCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JBSSXFFFCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

2.59

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.58

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.93

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.68

+0.09

Drawdowns

JBSSX vs. FFFCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JBSSX drawdown since its inception was -21.91%, smaller than the maximum FFFCX drawdown of -36.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JBSSX and FFFCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JBSSXFFFCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.91%

-36.88%

+14.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.14%

-4.00%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.48%

-5.83%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.71%

-18.35%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.91%

-18.35%

-3.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.39%

-4.57%

+1.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.16%

0.92%

+0.24%

Volatility

JBSSX vs. FFFCX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2025 Fund (JBSSX) has a higher volatility of 2.17% compared to Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX) at 2.02%. This indicates that JBSSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFFCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JBSSXFFFCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.17%

2.02%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.16%

4.15%

+1.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.34%

4.95%

+1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.73%

6.38%

+2.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.21%

6.30%

+2.91%

JBSSX vs. FFFCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JBSSX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FFFCX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

JBSSX vs. FFFCX - Dividend Comparison

JBSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, less than FFFCX's 4.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFFCX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund
4.66%4.97%2.99%2.72%7.23%9.33%6.01%5.78%6.98%4.82%3.22%3.68%
JBSSX
JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2025 Fund
3.33%3.53%3.27%2.75%2.05%5.11%3.42%3.15%5.49%2.04%2.15%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, JBSSX and FFFCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JBSSX has higher volatility (2.17%) compared to FFFCX (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JBSSX dropped -21.91% vs FFFCX's -36.88%.

FFFCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JBSSX and FFFCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer