JBND vs. MAGG
JBND (Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF) and MAGG (Madison Aggregate Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JBND returned 5.68% vs 5.46% for MAGG. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JBND charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for MAGG.
Performance
JBND vs. MAGG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JBND achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly higher than MAGG's 0.15% return.
JBND
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.22%
- 6M
- 0.25%
- 1Y
- 5.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGG
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 0.15%
- 6M
- 0.22%
- 1Y
- 5.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JBND vs. MAGG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JBND Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF | 0.22% | 8.21% | 3.19% | 7.76% |
MAGG Madison Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.15% | 7.28% | 1.81% | 7.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between JBND and MAGG is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2023 | 0.89 |
The correlation between JBND and MAGG shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JBND vs. MAGG — Risk / Return Rank
JBND
MAGG
JBND vs. MAGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF (JBND) and Madison Aggregate Bond ETF (MAGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JBND | MAGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.25 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 1.92 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.97 | 5.88 | +0.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JBND | MAGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 1.37 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.53 | 1.05 | +0.48 |
Drawdowns
JBND vs. MAGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JBND drawdown since its inception was -4.48%, roughly equal to the maximum MAGG drawdown of -4.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JBND and MAGG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JBND | MAGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.48% | -4.56% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.94% | -2.86% | -0.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.74% | -1.52% | -0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.15% | -1.25% | +0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 0.93% | +0.02% |
Volatility
JBND vs. MAGG - Volatility Comparison
Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF (JBND) and Madison Aggregate Bond ETF (MAGG) have volatilities of 1.20% and 1.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JBND | MAGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.20% | 1.17% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.67% | 2.58% | +0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.82% | 3.99% | -0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.84% | 4.75% | +0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.84% | 4.75% | +0.09% |
JBND vs. MAGG - Expense Ratio Comparison
JBND has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than MAGG's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
JBND vs. MAGG - Dividend Comparison
JBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, less than MAGG's 4.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JBND Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF | 4.41% | 4.42% | 4.58% | 1.00% |
MAGG Madison Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.74% | 4.80% | 5.13% | 1.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JBND and MAGG have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JBND has higher volatility (1.20%) compared to MAGG (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JBND dropped -4.48% vs MAGG's -4.56%.
On 1-year performance, JBND leads with 5.68% vs 5.46% for MAGG. On fees, JBND is cheaper at 0.30% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, JBND has performed better with a 5.68% return vs 5.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JBND is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MAGG.
MAGG has the higher dividend yield at 4.74%, compared with 4.41% for JBND.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Madison. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JBND and 0.40% for MAGG.
JBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JBND and MAGG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer