PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JBND vs. BUCK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JBND vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF (JBND) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JBND achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than BUCK's 2.07% return.


JBND

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.51%
YTD
0.35%
6M
0.51%
1Y
4.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUCK

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.17%
YTD
2.07%
6M
2.14%
1Y
6.97%
3Y*
5.23%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JBND vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
JBND
Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF
0.35%8.21%3.19%7.43%
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
2.07%4.13%7.25%0.64%

Correlation

The correlation between JBND and BUCK is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2023

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JBND vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JBND
JBND Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
JBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
JBND Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
JBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
JBND Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

BUCK
BUCK Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BUCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUCK Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
BUCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUCK Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JBND vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF (JBND) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JBNDBUCKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.50

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

5.35

-3.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.89

28.90

-24.01

JBND vs. BUCK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JBND Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the BUCK Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JBND and BUCK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JBND vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JBND drawdown since its inception was -4.48%, smaller than the maximum BUCK drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JBND and BUCK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JBNDBUCKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.48%

-5.43%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.94%

-1.31%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.62%

-0.09%

-1.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.16%

-0.49%

-0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

0.24%

+0.78%

Volatility

JBND vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison

Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF (JBND) has a higher volatility of 1.09% compared to Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK) at 0.28%. This indicates that JBND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JBNDBUCKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

0.28%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.78%

1.38%

+1.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.78%

2.98%

+0.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.83%

3.46%

+1.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.83%

3.46%

+1.37%

JBND vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison

JBND has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

JBND vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison

JBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, less than BUCK's 7.40% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
7.40%7.59%8.84%4.84%0.59%
JBND
Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF
4.40%4.42%4.58%1.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JBND and BUCK have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JBND has higher volatility (1.09%) compared to BUCK (0.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JBND dropped -4.48% vs BUCK's -5.43%.

On 1-year performance, BUCK leads with 6.97% vs 4.98% for JBND. On fees, JBND is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, BUCK has been the lower-risk option at 0.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BUCK has performed better with a 6.97% return vs 4.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JBND is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BUCK.

BUCK has the higher dividend yield at 7.40%, compared with 4.40% for JBND.

JBND is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while BUCK is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JBND and 0.35% for BUCK.

BUCK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JBND and BUCK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer