JBBB vs. JSML
JBBB (Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF) and JSML (Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JBBB is a CLO fund actively managed by Janus Henderson, while JSML is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Janus Small Cap Growth Alpha Index. JBBB is actively managed, while JSML is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JBBB returned 10.60%/yr vs 18.71%/yr for JSML. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JBBB charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for JSML.
Performance
JBBB vs. JSML - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JBBB achieves a 1.86% return, which is significantly lower than JSML's 19.06% return.
JBBB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 1.86%
- 6M
- 2.30%
- 1Y
- 5.54%
- 3Y*
- 10.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JSML
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 7.59%
- YTD
- 19.06%
- 6M
- 17.83%
- 1Y
- 33.64%
- 3Y*
- 18.71%
- 5Y*
- 6.09%
- 10Y*
- 12.88%
JBBB vs. JSML - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JBBB Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF | 1.86% | 5.43% | 12.50% | 17.63% | -5.99% |
JSML Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 19.06% | 13.41% | 12.45% | 30.09% | -25.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between JBBB and JSML is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2022 | 0.16 |
The correlation between JBBB and JSML shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
JBBB vs. JSML - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JBBB
JSML
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
JBBB
JSML
Basic Materials
JBBB
-
JSML
Communication Services
JBBB
-
JSML
Consumer Cyclical
JBBB
-
JSML
Consumer Defensive
JBBB
-
JSML
Energy
JBBB
-
JSML
Healthcare
JBBB
-
JSML
Industrials
JBBB
-
JSML
Real Estate
JBBB
-
JSML
Technology
JBBB
-
JSML
Utilities
JBBB
-
JSML
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JBBB vs. JSML — Risk / Return Rank
JBBB
JSML
JBBB vs. JSML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) and Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JBBB | JSML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.27 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 2.28 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.66 | 8.08 | -0.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JBBB | JSML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 1.57 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.30 | 0.56 | +0.74 |
Drawdowns
JBBB vs. JSML - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JBBB drawdown since its inception was -10.57%, smaller than the maximum JSML drawdown of -39.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JBBB and JSML.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JBBB | JSML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.57% | -39.65% | +29.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.46% | -14.84% | +12.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.82% | -25.60% | +21.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.84% | +0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.58% | -10.86% | +9.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.72% | 4.17% | -3.45% |
Volatility
JBBB vs. JSML - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) is 0.45%, while Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) has a volatility of 7.49%. This indicates that JBBB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JSML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JBBB | JSML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.45% | 7.49% | -7.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.76% | 15.94% | -13.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.34% | 21.56% | -18.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.26% | 24.34% | -19.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.26% | 24.27% | -19.01% |
JBBB vs. JSML - Expense Ratio Comparison
JBBB has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than JSML's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
JBBB vs. JSML - Dividend Comparison
JBBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.13%, more than JSML's 0.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JBBB Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF | 7.13% | 8.41% | 9.24% | 8.71% | 5.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JSML Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 0.80% | 0.94% | 1.19% | 0.49% | 0.67% | 0.46% | 0.30% | 0.27% | 0.76% | 0.42% | 0.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JBBB and JSML have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JSML has higher volatility (7.49%) compared to JBBB (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JBBB dropped -10.57% vs JSML's -39.65%.
On 3-year performance, JSML leads with 18.71% vs 10.60% for JBBB. On fees, JSML is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, JBBB has been the lower-risk option at 0.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, JSML has performed better with a 18.71% return vs 10.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JSML is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for JBBB.
JBBB has the higher dividend yield at 7.13%, compared with 0.80% for JSML.
JBBB is categorized as CLO, while JSML is Small Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for JBBB and 0.30% for JSML.
JBBB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JBBB and JSML
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer