JBBB vs. FLTR
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR).
JBBB and FLTR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JBBB is an actively managed fund by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Jan 11, 2022. FLTR is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. It was launched on Apr 25, 2011.
Performance
JBBB vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JBBB vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JBBB Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF | -0.81% | 5.43% | 12.50% | 17.63% | -5.99% |
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 0.71% | 5.22% | 7.38% | 7.41% | 0.74% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JBBB achieves a -0.81% return, which is significantly lower than FLTR's 0.71% return.
JBBB
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- -0.81%
- 6M
- 0.58%
- 1Y
- 3.88%
- 3Y*
- 10.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLTR
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- YTD
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 2.01%
- 1Y
- 4.72%
- 3Y*
- 6.48%
- 5Y*
- 4.28%
- 10Y*
- 3.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JBBB vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
JBBB has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTR's 0.14% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JBBB vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank
JBBB
FLTR
JBBB vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JBBB | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.78 | 2.10 | -1.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.11 | 2.43 | -1.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.93 | -0.74 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 2.47 | -1.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.00 | 18.16 | -13.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JBBB | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 | 2.10 | -1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 2.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.22 | 0.51 | +0.70 |
Correlation
The correlation between JBBB and FLTR is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
JBBB vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison
JBBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.38%, more than FLTR's 4.89% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JBBB Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF | 8.38% | 8.41% | 9.24% | 8.71% | 5.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 4.89% | 4.97% | 5.93% | 6.07% | 2.29% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% |
Drawdowns
JBBB vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JBBB drawdown since its inception was -10.57%, smaller than the maximum FLTR drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JBBB and FLTR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JBBB | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.57% | -17.84% | +7.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.49% | -1.93% | -1.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -3.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.01% | -0.12% | -1.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.62% | -0.68% | -0.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.85% | 0.26% | +0.59% |
Volatility
JBBB vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) has a higher volatility of 1.96% compared to VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) at 0.40%. This indicates that JBBB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JBBB | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.96% | 0.40% | +1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.60% | 0.57% | +2.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.04% | 2.25% | +2.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.33% | 2.14% | +3.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.33% | 5.01% | +0.32% |