JBBB vs. FLTR
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR).
JBBB and FLTR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JBBB is an actively managed fund by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Jan 11, 2022. FLTR is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. It was launched on Apr 25, 2011.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: JBBB or FLTR.
Performance
JBBB vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JBBB achieves a 9.58% return, which is significantly higher than FLTR's 6.56% return.
JBBB
9.58%
0.68%
4.59%
12.58%
N/A
N/A
FLTR
6.56%
0.61%
3.11%
7.55%
3.39%
2.72%
Key characteristics
| JBBB | FLTR | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 5.62 | 7.47 |
| Sortino Ratio | 8.72 | 12.28 |
| Omega Ratio | 3.00 | 3.85 |
| Calmar Ratio | 8.51 | 10.31 |
| Martin Ratio | 49.13 | 115.34 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.26% | 0.07% |
| Daily Std Dev | 2.27% | 1.02% |
| Max Drawdown | -10.79% | -17.84% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -0.08% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JBBB vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
JBBB has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTR's 0.14% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between JBBB and FLTR is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
JBBB vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
JBBB vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison
JBBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.70%, more than FLTR's 6.10% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JBBB Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF | 7.70% | 8.10% | 5.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 6.10% | 6.08% | 2.30% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% | 0.66% | 0.65% |
Drawdowns
JBBB vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JBBB drawdown since its inception was -10.79%, smaller than the maximum FLTR drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JBBB and FLTR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
JBBB vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) has a higher volatility of 0.55% compared to VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) at 0.26%. This indicates that JBBB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.